Distribution-Centric Policy Optimization Dominates Exploration-Exploitation Trade-off
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The exploration-exploitation (EE) trade-off is a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs). With Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), training tends to be exploitation driven: entropy decreases monotonically, samples convergence, and exploration fades. Most existing fixes are sample-centric: they seek or bonus rare samples, assuming exploration comes from novel trajectories and tokens. These heuristics depend on the "luck" of informative samples, lack principled control of the policy, and often yield limited or inconsistent gains. In this work, we are the first to introduce a distribution-centric perspective for RL, in which exploration is always guided by a "better" target distribution, and reveal that a policy's ability to resist entropy collapse is governed by the distribution itself rather than individual samples. Building on this insight, we propose Distribution-Centric Policy Optimization (DCPO), which reformulates entropy regulation as distribution-level regularization. DCPO achieves controllable entropy fully on-policy without sampling from external distributions, enabling efficient exploration while maintaining training stability. Across multiple models and seven benchmarks, DCPO improves over GRPO by about 20% on average. Overall, DCPO replaces sample-level heuristics with distribution-level principles, offering a theoretically grounded and flexible framework for controllable exploration and a stronger EE trade-off. The code is available in https://github.com/597358816/DCPO.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.
Builds on
37 of 50 references.
References · 37
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
25 more
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 485
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMscited by 289
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 281
- 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 182
- 2017Equivalence Between Policy Gradients and Soft Q-Learningcited by 173
- 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 127
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 92
- 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weightingcited by 91
- 2025T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scalingcited by 77
- 2023MM-LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment in Multi-Modal Datasetscited by 61
- 2025On Entropy Control in LLM-RL Algorithmscited by 40
- 2025Rethinking Entropy Regularization in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 26
- 2016Combining policy gradient and Q-learningcited by 24
- 2025Entropy-guided sequence weighting for efficient exploration in RL-based LLM fine-tuningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Targeted Exploration via Unified Entropy Control for Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Entropy-Preserving Reinforcement Learning
- 2025CE-GPPO: Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimization in Reinforcement Learning
- 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping
- 2026Policy Split: Incentivizing Dual-Mode Exploration in LLM Reinforcement with Dual-Mode Entropy Regularization
- 2026Entropy Pacing Policy Optimization for Multi-Task Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- 2025EEPO: Exploration-Enhanced Policy Optimization via Sample-Then-Forget
- 2026Tool-Aware Optimization with Entropy Guidance for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning