GFT: From Imitation to Reward Fine-Tuning with Unbiased Group Advantages and Dynamic Coefficient Rectification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are typically post-trained using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), yet effectively unifying efficient knowledge injection with robust generalization remains challenging. In this work, we provide a training-dynamics analysis showing that SFT can be interpreted as a special case of policy gradient optimization with an extremely sparse implicit reward and unstable inverse-probability weighting, which together lead to single-path dependency, entropy collapse, and gradient explosion. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose Group Fine-Tuning (GFT), a unified post-training framework that addresses these intrinsic limitations through two mechanisms: Group Advantage Learning, which constructs diverse response groups and derives normalized contrastive supervision to alleviate reward sparsity, and Dynamic Coefficient Rectification, which adaptively bounds inverse-probability weights to stabilize optimization while preserving efficient knowledge injection. Experiments demonstrate that GFT consistently surpasses SFT-based methods and yields policies that integrate more smoothly with subsequent RL training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
37 of 44 references.
References · 37
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
25 more
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 725
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
- 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 281
- 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 263
- 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 186
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 106
- 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weightingcited by 91
- 2023OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 85
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoningcited by 84
- 2025An Empirical Study on Eliciting and Improving R1-like Reasoning Modelscited by 78
- 2025All Roads Lead to Likelihood: The Value of Reinforcement Learning in Fine-Tuningcited by 59
- 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 59
- 2023Instruction-tuning Aligns LLMs to the Human Braincited by 40
- 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
- 2025The Synergy Dilemma of Long-CoT SFT and RL: Investigating Post-Training Techniques for Reasoning VLMscited by 12
- 2025Unveiling Over-Memorization in Finetuning LLMs for Reasoning Taskscited by 11
- 2025One-Token Rollout: Guiding Supervised Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Policy Gradientcited by 8
- 2025Distilled Pretraining: A modern lens of Data, In-Context Learning and Test-Time Scalingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning
- 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026GVPO++: Group Variance Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training and On-Policy Distillation
- 2026On the Hidden Objective Biases of Group-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connections
- 2026On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-training
- 2025GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Training