One-Token Rollout: Guiding Supervised Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Policy Gradient
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is the predominant method for adapting large language models (LLMs), yet it often struggles with generalization compared to reinforcement learning (RL). In this work, we posit that this performance disparity stems not just from the loss function, but from a more fundamental difference: SFT learns from a fixed, pre-collected dataset, whereas RL utilizes on-policy data sampled from the current policy. Building on this hypothesis, we introduce one-token rollout (OTR), a novel fine-tuning algorithm that guides SFT with the policy gradient method. OTR reframes the autoregressive learning process by treating each token generation as a single-step reinforcement learning trajectory. At each step, it performs a Monte Carlo ``rollout'' by sampling multiple candidate tokens from the current policy's distribution. The ground-truth token from the supervised data is then used to provide a reward signal to these samples. Guided by policy gradient, our algorithm repurposes static, off-policy supervised data into a dynamic, on-policy signal at the token level, capturing the generalization benefits of on-policy learning while bypassing the costly overhead of full sentence generation. Through extensive experiments on a diverse suite of challenging benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, code generation, and general domain reasoning, we demonstrate that OTR consistently outperforms standard SFT. Our findings establish OTR as a powerful and practical alternative for fine-tuning LLMs and provide compelling evidence that the on-policy nature of data is a critical driver of generalization, offering a promising new direction for fine-tuning LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
References · 26
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
14 more
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 185
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
- 2025GPG: A Simple and Strong Reinforcement Learning Baseline for Model Reasoningcited by 150
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
- 2025BIG-Bench Extra Hardcited by 125
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 106
- 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuningcited by 95
- 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
- 2025Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connectionscited by 17
- 2025RLHF in an SFT Way: From Optimal Solution to Reward-Weighted Alignmentcited by 14
- 2025ToTRL: Unlock LLM Tree-of-Thoughts Reasoning Potential through Puzzles Solvingcited by 8
- 2025On-Policy Optimization with Group Equivalent Preference for Multi-Programming Language Understandingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2026PivotRL: High Accuracy Agentic Post-Training at Low Compute Costcited by 14
- 2026SED-SFT: Selectively Encouraging Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 7
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026GIFT: Reconciling Post-Training Objectives via Variational Finite-Temperature Gibbs Initializationcited by 2
- 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Predictioncited by 1
- 2026GFT: From Imitation to Reward Fine-Tuning with Unbiased Group Advantages and Dynamic Coefficient Rectificationcited by 1
- 2026Online Self-Weighted Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026On-Policy or Off-Policy Learning? A Systematic Study of Distillation Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026On-Policy or Off-Policy Learning? A Systematic Study of Distillation Dynamics28 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Self-Weighted Fine-Tuning1 Sep 2026
- 2026GFT: From Imitation to Reward Fine-Tuning with Unbiased Group Advantages and Dynamic Coefficient Rectification15 Apr 2026
- 2026PivotRL: High Accuracy Agentic Post-Training at Low Compute Cost22 Mar 2026
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models14 Mar 2026
- 2026SED-SFT: Selectively Encouraging Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning7 Feb 2026
- 2026GIFT: Reconciling Post-Training Objectives via Variational Finite-Temperature Gibbs Initialization14 Jan 2026
- 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction28 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reusing Rollouts under Policy Lag: Prefix-Normalized Policy Optimization for LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2025RL-finetuning LLMs from on- and off-policy data with a single algorithm
- 2026Fine-Tuning on Self-Generated and Reward-Weighted Data: Learning Dynamics, Convergence Rates, and Benefits of Off-Policyness
- 2026Entropy-Gated Selective Policy Optimization:Token-Level Gradient Allocation for Hybrid Training of Large Language Models
- 2026Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weighting
- 2024Self-Evolution Fine-Tuning for Policy Optimization
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning