NetAgentBench: A State-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Network Configuration
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
As agentic network management gains popularity, there is a critical need for evaluation frameworks that transcend static, one-shot testing. To address this, we introduce NetAgentBench, a dynamic benchmark that evaluates agent interactions through a Finite State Machine (FSM) formalization guaranteeing determinism, correctness, and bounded execution. This provides the networking landscape with a rigorous foundation to measure complex, multi-turn operational behaviors. Our empirical evaluation of four state-of-the-art LLM agents through diverse network configuration tasks reveals stark deficiencies: while agents can solve basic tasks, they suffer severe exploration meltdowns and coherence collapse during expert-level configurations. Ultimately, NetAgentBench demonstrates that systematically evaluating multi-turn behavioral stability is an indispensable step toward realizing trustworthy, fully autonomous networks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
15 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 14
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 319
- 2024NetLLM: Adapting Large Language Models for Networkingcited by 76
- 2025Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agentscited by 75
- 2023Large Language Models for Networking: Applications, Enabling Techniques, and Challengescited by 28
- 2017Why (and How) Networks Should Run Themselvescited by 13
- 2023Making Network Configuration Human Friendlycited by 12
- 2024Can LLMs Understand Computer Networks? Towards a Virtual System Administratorcited by 11
- 2024Large Language Models for Zero Touch Network Configuration Managementcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operationscited by 0
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environmentscited by 0
- 2026Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?cited by 0
- 2026Can AI Agents Deliver Verifiable Network-Wide Outcomes Across Authority Boundaries?cited by 0
- 2026Can AI Agents Deliver Verifiable Network-Wide Outcomes Across Authority Boundaries?9 Sep 2026
- 2026Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?9 Sep 2026
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environments20 Aug 2026
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operations12 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026NetConfArena: An Executable Benchmark for LLM Agents in Closed-Loop Network Configuration
- 2026BekchiAI: Measuring, Observing, and Controlling LLM Agents in One Click
- 2026MeshHeal: Two-Timescale Self-Healing for Gray Failures in Decentralized LLM Agent Networks
- 2026The Replay Gap: Static Evaluation of Model Switching in LLM Agents Scores the Wrong World
- 2026AgentPerfBench: A Benchmarking and Evaluation Suite for Inference Performance of Agentic LLMs
- 2025Beyond Black-Box Benchmarking: Observability, Analytics, and Optimization of Agentic Systems
- 2025AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
- 2025CORE: Full-Path Evaluation of LLM Agents Beyond Final State