BekchiAI: Measuring, Observing, and Controlling LLM Agents in One Click
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model agents reason, call tools, and act autonomously over many steps, but their agentic skills-correctly sequencing tools, planning under dependencies, judging untrusted inputs, and grounding generated arguments-are hard to measure with accuracy-only leaderboards. We present BekchiAI, which addresses both sides: a benchmark for measuring agentic skill and a platform for observing and controlling live agents. The BekchiAI-Benchmark, a suite of 13 tool-using ReAct agents across 7 task categories (arithmetic, structured/SQL, security detection, URL grounding, planning, orchestration, and tool-policy), totalling 2,057 deterministic, committed test tasks. Every task is verifier-checkable gold answers are computed by running canonical SQL against a real database, computing the exact schedule of a directed acyclic graph (DAG), or evaluating closed-form lambdas including adversarial security samples paired with deliberately imperfect signature scanners so a score reflects the model's own judgment, not the copying of an oracle. We define a small set of behavioral metrics beyond accuracy-tool-call adherence, URL hallucination and source-match, and per-model token cost and report a four-model comparison (Qwen3.7-Max, gemma-4-31B-it, gemma4:26b, gpt-oss-120b) whose story is in the per-family spread, not the aggregate. The benchmark runs are executed using the provided evaluation scripts. BekchiAI-Platform is a complementary web-based observability and control layer for deployed agents, providing full token and latency telemetry as well as remote run termination. The benchmark, evaluation tools, and platform are publicly released.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar
Other references · 13
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
1 more
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems
- 2025MAPS: A Multilingual Benchmark for Agent Performance and Security
- 2026AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks
- 2026AgentEscapeBench: Evaluating Out-of-Domain Tool-Grounded Reasoning in LLM Agents
- 2026Agentic CLEAR: Automating Multi-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents
- 2026AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?
- 2026SkillAtlas: An Attack Trace Library for Agent Skills
- 2026Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents