mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Black-Box Benchmarking: Observability, Analytics, and Optimization of Agentic Systems

arXiv 2503.06745 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2025cs.AI cs.MAcited by 14

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of agentic AI systems, where agents collaborate to perform diverse tasks, poses new challenges with observing, analyzing and optimizing their behavior. Traditional evaluation and benchmarking approaches struggle to handle the non-deterministic, context-sensitive, and dynamic nature of these systems. This paper explores key challenges and opportunities in analyzing and optimizing agentic systems across development, testing, and maintenance. We explore critical issues such as natural language variability and unpredictable execution flows, which hinder predictability and control, demanding adaptive strategies to manage input variability and evolving behaviors. Through our user study, we supported these hypotheses. In particular, we showed a 79% agreement that non deterministic flow of agentic systems acts as a major challenge. Finally, we validated our statements empirically advocating the need for moving beyond classical benchmarking. To bridge these gaps, we introduce taxonomies to present expected analytics outcomes and the ways to collect them by extending standard observability frameworks. Building on these foundations, we introduce and demonstrate novel approach for benchmarking of agent evaluation systems. Unlike traditional "black box" performance evaluation approaches, our benchmark is built from agent runtime logs as input, and analytics outcome including discovered flows and issues. By addressing key limitations in existing methodologies, we aim to set the stage for more advanced and holistic evaluation strategies, which could foster the development of adaptive, interpretable, and robust agentic AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2025.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155
  3. 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 132
  4. 2024The Butterfly Effect of Altering Prompts: How Small Changes and Jailbreaks Affect Large Language Model Performancecited by 97

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 8.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise
  2. 2026On Randomness in Agentic Evals
  3. 2026Evaluating Agentic AI in the Wild: Failure Modes, Drift Patterns, and a Production Evaluation Framework
  4. 2026Agent Skill Evaluation and Evolution: Frameworks and Benchmarks
  5. 2025Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks
  6. 2026Harbor Adapters and Harbor-Index: Infrastructure and a Curated Meta-Dataset for Large-Scale Agentic Evaluation
  7. 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts
  8. 2026Agentic CLEAR: Automating Multi-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents