Beyond Semantics: Uncovering the Physics of Fakes via Universal Physical Descriptors for Cross-Modal Synthetic Detection
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of AI generated content (AIGC) has blurred the boundaries between real and synthetic images, exposing the limitations of existing deepfake detectors that often overfit to specific generative models. This adaptability crisis calls for a fundamental reexamination of the intrinsic physical characteristics that distinguish natural from AI-generated images. In this paper, we address two critical research questions: (1) What physical features can stably and robustly discriminate AI generated images across diverse datasets and generative architectures? (2) Can these objective pixel-level features be integrated into multimodal models like CLIP to enhance detection performance while mitigating the unreliability of language-based information? To answer these questions, we conduct a comprehensive exploration of 15 physical features across more than 20 datasets generated by various GANs and diffusion models. We propose a novel feature selection algorithm that identifies five core physical features including Laplacian variance, Sobel statistics, and residual noise variance that exhibit consistent discriminative power across all tested datasets. These features are then converted into text encoded values and integrated with semantic captions to guide image text representation learning in CLIP. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple Genimage benchmarks, with near-perfect accuracy (99.8%) on datasets such as Wukong and SDv1.4. By bridging pixel level authenticity with semantic understanding, this work pioneers the use of physically grounded features for trustworthy vision language modeling and opens new directions for mitigating hallucinations and textual inaccuracies in large multimodal models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Towards Explainable Fake Image Detection with Multi-Modal Large Language Models19 Apr
- 2024FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models20 Apr
Other references · 28
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 332
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 286
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2023Forgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 180
16 more
- 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 177
- 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 172
- 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 138
- 2023Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 126
- 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
- 2024C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detectioncited by 111
- 2021Representative Forgery Mining for Fake Face Detectioncited by 108
- 2023Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulationcited by 98
- 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2021BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detectioncited by 60
- 2021Beyond the Spectrum: Detecting Deepfakes via Re-Synthesiscited by 44
- 2025CO-SPY: Combining Semantic and Pixel Features to Detect Synthetic Images by AIcited by 42
- 2025Physics-Driven Spatiotemporal Modeling for AI-Generated Video Detectioncited by 27
- 2024What makes an image realistic?cited by 10
- 2026Pixels Don't Lie (But Your Detector Might): Bootstrapping MLLM-as-a-Judge for Trustworthy Deepfake Detection and Reasoning Supervisioncited by 5
- 2025Beyond Semantic Features: Pixel-level Mapping for Generalized AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation
- 2023Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion models
- 2024Synthetic Photography Detection: A Visual Guidance for Identifying Synthetic Images Created by AI
- 2025Methods and Trends in Detecting AI-Generated Images: A Comprehensive Review
- 2025VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems
- 2023Parents and Children: Distinguishing Multimodal DeepFakes from Natural Images
- 2025AdaptPrompt: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of VLMs for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
- 2024Towards More Accurate Fake Detection on Images Generated from Advanced Generative and Neural Rendering Models