mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometrically Constrained Outlier Synthesis

arXiv 2603.08413 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks for image classification often exhibit overconfidence on out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. To address this, we introduce Geometrically Constrained Outlier Synthesis (GCOS), a training-time regularization framework aimed at improving OOD robustness during inference. GCOS addresses a limitation of prior synthesis methods by generating virtual outliers in the hidden feature space that respect the learned manifold structure of in-distribution (ID) data. The synthesis proceeds in two stages: (i) a dominant-variance subspace extracted from the training features identifies geometrically informed, off-manifold directions; (ii) a conformally-inspired shell, defined by the empirical quantiles of a nonconformity score from a calibration set, adaptively controls the synthesis magnitude to produce boundary samples. The shell ensures that generated outliers are neither trivially detectable nor indistinguishable from in-distribution data, facilitating smoother learning of robust features. This is combined with a contrastive regularization objective that promotes separability of ID and OOD samples in a chosen score space, such as Mahalanobis or energy-based. Experiments demonstrate that GCOS outperforms state-of-the-art methods using standard energy-based inference on near-OOD benchmarks, defined as tasks where outliers share the same semantic domain as in-distribution data. As an exploratory extension, the framework naturally transitions to conformal OOD inference, which translates uncertainty scores into statistically valid p-values and enables thresholds with formal error guarantees, providing a pathway toward more predictable and reliable OOD detection.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.

Builds on

39 of 63 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  8. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  9. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  10. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  11. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  12. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
27 more
  1. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
  2. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  3. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 511
  4. 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
  5. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  6. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  7. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  8. 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
  9. 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
  10. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 402
  11. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  12. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 348
  13. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
  14. 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
  15. 2022Conformal Risk Controlcited by 290
  16. 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
  17. 2022Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 212
  18. 2022POEM: Out-of-Distribution Detection with Posterior Samplingcited by 108
  19. 2023Dream the Impossible: Outlier Imagination with Diffusion Modelscited by 77
  20. 2023Learning to Augment Distributions for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 38
  21. 2024How Does Unlabeled Data Provably Help Out-of-Distribution Detection?cited by 36
  22. 2019Analysis of Confident-Classifiers for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 7
  23. 2024Out-of-Distribution Detection Should Use Conformal Prediction (and Vice-versa?)cited by 7
  24. 2014From conformal to probabilistic predictioncited by 4
  25. 2024Non-Linear Outlier Synthesis for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4
  26. 2025Outlier Synthesis via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4
  27. 2025BOOD: Boundary-based Out-Of-Distribution Data Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.