Replaying pre-training data improves fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To obtain a language model for a target domain (e.g. math), the current paradigm is to pre-train on a vast amount of generic web text and then fine-tune on the relatively limited amount of target data. Typically, generic data is only mixed in during fine-tuning to prevent catastrophic forgetting of the generic domain. We surprisingly find that replaying the generic data during fine-tuning can actually improve performance on the (less related) target task. Concretely, in a controlled pre-training environment with 4M target tokens, 4B total tokens, and 150M parameter models, generic replay increases target data efficiency by up to 1.87× for fine-tuning and 2.06× for mid-training. We further analyze data schedules that introduce target data during pre-training and find that replay helps more when there is less target data present in pre-training. We demonstrate the success of replay in practice for fine-tuning 8B parameter models, improving agentic web navigation success by 4.5% and Basque question-answering accuracy by 2%.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
52 of 69 references.
References · 52
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,099
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
38 more
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 723
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2020XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoningcited by 333
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 238
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 232
- 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 215
- 2024WebLINX: Real-World Website Navigation with Multi-Turn Dialoguecited by 180
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 144
- 2023Continual Pre-Training of Large Language Models: How to (re)warm your model?cited by 137
- 2024Simple and Scalable Strategies to Continually Pre-train Large Language Modelscited by 127
- 2023Skill-it! A Data-Driven Skills Framework for Understanding and Training Language Modelscited by 121
- 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 109
- 2020When Do Curricula Work?cited by 106
- 2024How Do Large Language Models Acquire Factual Knowledge During Pretraining?cited by 90
- 2024Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 81
- 2024Scaling Laws for Data Filtering -- Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnosticcited by 77
- 2024Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizerscited by 76
- 2025Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-Tunecited by 58
- 2024Investigating Continual Pretraining in Large Language Models: Insights and Implicationscited by 57
- 2024Instruction-tuned Language Models are Better Knowledge Learnerscited by 55
- 2024Does your data spark joy? Performance gains from domain upsampling at the end of trainingcited by 52
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
- 2024Adaptive Data Optimization: Dynamic Sample Selection with Scaling Lawscited by 47
- 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
- 2023Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinementscited by 43
- 2024Latxa: An Open Language Model and Evaluation Suite for Basquecited by 42
- 2025Weight Ensembling Improves Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 38
- 2025The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Trainingcited by 33
- 2024Understanding Finetuning for Factual Knowledge Extractioncited by 32
- 2023Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed Inputscited by 22
- 2025Not All Tokens Are What You Need In Thinkingcited by 20
- 2023Irreducible Curriculum for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 16
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 10
- 2026The Finetuner's Fallacy: When to Pretrain with Your Finetuning Datacited by 9
- 2026Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocscited by 7
- 2026Forgetting in Language Models: Capacity, Optimization, and Self-Generated Replaycited by 7
- 2026Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtrainingcited by 6
- 2026Early Data Exposure Improves Robustness to Subsequent Fine-Tuningcited by 4
- 2026ufakzeka-1: Building and Evaluating a 151M-Parameter Turkish Language Model from Scratchcited by 2
- 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAGcited by 1
- 2026Continual Learning via Self-Probe Gradientscited by 1
- 2026Loss Smoothing for Stable Adaptation Under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026Thinking at the Right Size: Amortized Distillation Across Post-Trained LLMscited by 0
1 more
- 2026Continual Learning via Self-Probe Gradients26 Sep 2026
- 2026ufakzeka-1: Building and Evaluating a 151M-Parameter Turkish Language Model from Scratch18 Sep 2026
- 2026Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating8 Sep 2026
- 2026Thinking at the Right Size: Amortized Distillation Across Post-Trained LLMs24 Aug 2026
- 2026Loss Smoothing for Stable Adaptation Under Distribution Shift1 Jul 2026
- 2026Forgetting in Language Models: Capacity, Optimization, and Self-Generated Replay25 May 2026
- 2026Early Data Exposure Improves Robustness to Subsequent Fine-Tuning12 May 2026
- 2026Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting4 May 2026
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining15 Apr 2026
- 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAG24 Mar 2026
- 2026Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models21 Mar 2026
- 2026Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocs19 Mar 2026
1 more
- 2026Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 10
- 2026Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocscited by 7
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtrainingcited by 6
- 2026Early Data Exposure Improves Robustness to Subsequent Fine-Tuningcited by 4
- 2026ufakzeka-1: Building and Evaluating a 151M-Parameter Turkish Language Model from Scratchcited by 2
- 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAGcited by 1
- 2026Continual Learning via Self-Probe Gradientscited by 1
- 2026Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updatingcited by 0
- 2026Continual Learning via Self-Probe Gradients26 Sep 2026
- 2026ufakzeka-1: Building and Evaluating a 151M-Parameter Turkish Language Model from Scratch18 Sep 2026
- 2026Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating8 Sep 2026
- 2026Early Data Exposure Improves Robustness to Subsequent Fine-Tuning12 May 2026
- 2026Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting4 May 2026
- 2026(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining15 Apr 2026
- 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAG24 Mar 2026
- 2026Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocs19 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Why Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Enables MLLMs Preserve Prior Knowledge Better: A Data Perspective
- 2026On-Policy Replay for Continual Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2025Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout Replay
- 2026Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?
- 2025Balancing Synthetic Data and Replay for Enhancing Task-Specific Capabilities
- 2025Contextual Experience Replay for Self-Improvement of Language Agents
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026Data Repetition Beats Data Scaling in Long-CoT Supervised Fine-Tuning