Balancing Synthetic Data and Replay for Enhancing Task-Specific Capabilities
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Self-rewarding alignment and self-training
Abstract (arXiv)
Adapting language models to new tasks through continued pretraining faces a fundamental trade-off: models must learn new capabilities while avoiding catastrophic forgetting of existing knowledge. While prior work has studied synthetic data generation techniques, the optimal replay ratios for balancing task performance and knowledge retention under computational constraints remain poorly understood. We present a comprehensive empirical study investigating the interplay between replay ratio configuration and computational budget when adapting language models to new tasks. Using the bAbI reasoning tasks as our target objective, we apply synthetic data generation and systematically evaluate different total token budgets and replay ratio configurations. We analyze their effects on both task mastery and general knowledge retention. Our experiments reveal an optimal configuration that balances task-specific performance with general knowledge retention. Based on our findings, we provide empirically-grounded guidelines for selecting replay ratios based on computational budget, enabling practitioners to achieve strong task adaptation with significantly reduced training costs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Self-rewarding alignment and self-training, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 20 references.
References · 16
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
- 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
- 2024Simple and Scalable Strategies to Continually Pre-train Large Language Modelscited by 122
4 more
- 2024Synthetic continued pretrainingcited by 56
- 2024On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Modelscited by 56
- 2023MuggleMath: Assessing the Impact of Query and Response Augmentation on Math Reasoningcited by 45
- 2025Synthesize-on-Graph: Knowledgeable Synthetic Data Generation for Continue Pre-training of Large Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Forgetting in Language Models: Capacity, Optimization, and Self-Generated Replay
- 2026Rethinking Transfer in Continual Learning: A Replay-Based Realisation
- 2026ContinualSkillBench: Can LLM Agents Truly Evolve Their Capabilities?
- 2025Increasing the Thinking Budget is Not All You Need
- 2026DIVE: Unlocking Self-Improvement in Frozen Language Models Through Diversity-Driven Skill Evolution
- 2025Knowledge Collapse in LLMs: When Fluency Survives but Facts Fail under Recursive Synthetic Training
- 2026From Passive Reuse to Active Reasoning: Grounding Large Language Models for Neuro-Symbolic Experience Replay
- 2026Reasoning as State Transition: A Representational Analysis of Reasoning Evolution in Large Language Models