Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synthetic data augmentation has emerged as a promising solution when pre-training is constrained by data rather than compute. We study how to design synthetic data algorithms that achieve better loss scaling: not only lowering loss at finite compute but especially as compute approaches infinity. We first show that pre-training on web data mixed with synthetically generated rephrases improves i.i.d. validation loss on the web data, despite the synthetic data coming from an entirely different distribution. With optimal mixing and epoching, loss and benchmark accuracy improve without overfitting as the number of synthetic generations grows, plateauing near 1.48× data efficiency at 32 rephrases per document. We find even better loss scaling under a new perspective: synthetic generations from the same document can form a single substantially longer megadocument instead of many short documents. We show two ways to construct megadocs: stitching synthetic rephrases from the same web document or stretching a document by inserting rationales. Both methods improve i.i.d. loss, downstream benchmarks, and especially long-context loss relative to simple rephrasing, increasing data efficiency from 1.48× to 1.80× at 32 generations per document. Importantly, the improvement of megadocs over simple rephrasing widens as more synthetic data is generated. Our results show how to design synthetic data algorithms that benefit more from increasing compute when data-constrained.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 40 references.
References · 30
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2019Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Modelcited by 431
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
- 2023Synthetic Data from Diffusion Models Improves ImageNet Classificationcited by 326
- 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 292
- 2023Effective Data Augmentation With Diffusion Modelscited by 282
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 272
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2021QuALITY: Question Answering with Long Input Texts, Yes!cited by 204
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
18 more
- 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 156
- 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 153
- 2023Call for Papers -- The BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpuscited by 62
- 2025Diffusion Beats Autoregressive in Data-Constrained Settingscited by 61
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
- 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
- 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Modelscited by 44
- 2025Reasoning to Learn from Latent Thoughtscited by 43
- 2026From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligencecited by 39
- 2025Recycling the Web: A Method to Enhance Pre-training Data Quality and Quantity for Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Energy-Based Transformers are Scalable Learners and Thinkerscited by 30
- 2024Instruction Fine-Tuning: Does Prompt Loss Matter?cited by 26
- 2025Pre-training under infinite computecited by 24
- 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfallscited by 24
- 2024Analysing The Impact of Sequence Composition on Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 22
- 2026Replaying pre-training data improves fine-tuningcited by 12
- 2025Learning Facts at Scale with Active Readingcited by 11
- 2025Synthetic bootstrapped pretrainingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?cited by 3
- 2026Self-Play Pretraining with Zero Datacited by 1
- 2026Data-Constrained Language Model Pretraining: Improved Regularization and Scaling Lawscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Safe Data: Pretraining-Stage Alignment with Regular Safety Reflectioncited by 0
- 2026Unfolding Scientific Papers into Multi-Turn Generation Trajectories for Continued Pre-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recallcited by 0
- 2026It's All Training: A Fully Synthetic Single-Stage Recipe for LLMscited by 0
- 2026It's All Training: A Fully Synthetic Single-Stage Recipe for LLMs29 Sep 2026
- 2026Self-Play Pretraining with Zero Data24 Sep 2026
- 2026Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recall1 Sep 2026
- 2026Unfolding Scientific Papers into Multi-Turn Generation Trajectories for Continued Pre-Training26 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond Safe Data: Pretraining-Stage Alignment with Regular Safety Reflection17 Jun 2026
- 2026Data-Constrained Language Model Pretraining: Improved Regularization and Scaling Laws5 Jun 2026
- 2026Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?2 Jun 2026