mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ElliCE: Efficient and Provably Robust Algorithmic Recourse via the Rashomon Sets

arXiv 2602.07674 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models now influence decisions that directly affect people's lives, making it important to understand not only their predictions, but also how individuals could act to obtain better results. Algorithmic recourse provides actionable input modifications to achieve more favorable outcomes, typically relying on counterfactual explanations to suggest such changes. However, when the Rashomon set - the set of near-optimal models - is large, standard counterfactual explanations can become unreliable, as a recourse action valid for one model may fail under another. We introduce ElliCE, a novel framework for robust algorithmic recourse that optimizes counterfactuals over an ellipsoidal approximation of the Rashomon set. The resulting explanations are provably valid over this ellipsoid, with theoretical guarantees on uniqueness, stability, and alignment with key feature directions. Empirically, ElliCE generates counterfactuals that are not only more robust but also more flexible, adapting to user-specified feature constraints while being substantially faster than existing baselines. This provides a principled and practical solution for reliable recourse under model uncertainty, ensuring stable recommendations for users even as models evolve.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.

Builds on

47 of 64 references.

References · 47

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
  4. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  5. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  6. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  7. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  8. 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
  9. 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
  10. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  11. 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
  12. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
35 more
  1. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
  2. 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 87
  3. 2022Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Treescited by 80
  4. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
  5. 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
  6. 2024Amazing Things Come From Having Many Good Modelscited by 52
  7. 2017Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learningcited by 49
  8. 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
  9. 2022Rashomon Capacity: A Metric for Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 46
  10. 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
  11. 2018Interpretable Credit Application Predictions With Counterfactual Explanationscited by 43
  12. 2023A Path to Simpler Models Starts With Noisecited by 33
  13. 2023Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Modelscited by 30
  14. 2023The Rashomon Importance Distribution: Getting RID of Unstable, Single Model-based Variable Importancecited by 29
  15. 2023An Empirical Evaluation of the Rashomon Effect in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 25
  16. 2022Formalising the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networkscited by 24
  17. 2020Scaling Guarantees for Nearest Counterfactual Explanationscited by 22
  18. 2023Provably Robust and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks via Robust Optimisationcited by 20
  19. 2024Dropout-Based Rashomon Set Exploration for Efficient Predictive Multiplicity Estimationcited by 18
  20. 2025Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learningcited by 17
  21. 2023Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling (Technical Report)cited by 15
  22. 2025Rashomon Sets for Prototypical-Part Networks: Editing Interpretable Models in Real-Timecited by 13
  23. 2025Be Intentional About Fairness!: Fairness, Size, and Multiplicity in the Rashomon Setcited by 10
  24. 2025Performative Validity of Recourse Explanationscited by 8
  25. 2024Interval Abstractions for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 7
  26. 2024Perceptions of the Fairness Impacts of Multiplicity in Machine Learningcited by 7
  27. 2025RobustX: Robust Counterfactual Explanations Made Easycited by 6
  28. 2025Beyond the Single-Best Model: Rashomon Partial Dependence Profile for Trustworthy Explanations in AutoMLcited by 6
  29. 2024Sparse and Faithful Explanations Without Sparse Modelscited by 5
  30. 2025From Search To Sampling: Generative Models For Robust Algorithmic Recoursecited by 5
  31. 2025Fairness and Sparsity within Rashomon sets: Enumeration-Free Exploration and Characterizationcited by 4
  32. 2025Robust Counterfactual Explanations under Model Multiplicity Using Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 3
  33. 2025Optimal Robust Recourse with Lp-Bounded Model Changecited by 3
  34. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Durable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 3
  35. 2022Don't Explain Noise: Robust Counterfactuals for Randomized Ensemblescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.