mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queries

arXiv 2602.06361 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2026cs.GT cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods (items) in which the agents' valuations cannot be observed directly, but instead can only be accessed via noisy queries. In the two-agent setting with Gaussian noise and bounded valuations, we derive upper and lower bounds on the required number of queries for finding an envy-free allocation in terms of the number of items, m, and the negative-envy of the optimal allocation, Delta. In particular, when Delta is not too small (namely, Delta gg m1/4), we establish that the optimal number of queries scales as frac√ m (Delta / m)2 = fracm2.5Delta2 up to logarithmic factors. Our upper bound is based on non-adaptive queries and a simple thresholding-based allocation algorithm that runs in polynomial time, while our lower bound holds even under adaptive queries and arbitrary computation time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
  2. 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
  3. 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
  4. 2017Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuationscited by 22
  5. 2022Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questionscited by 18
  6. 2022Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 17
  7. 2023No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocationcited by 9
  8. 2023Nash Regret Guarantees for Linear Banditscited by 9
  9. 2023Learning Fair Division from Bandit Feedbackcited by 8
  10. 2024Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Divisioncited by 7
  11. 2023Bandit Social Learning: Exploration under Myopic Behaviorcited by 6
  12. 2020Fair Division: The Computer Scientist's Perspectivecited by 4
14 more
  1. 2021How to Design Robust Algorithms using Noisy Comparison Oraclecited by 4
  2. 2024Keep Everyone Happy: Online Fair Division of Numerous Items with Few Copiescited by 4
  3. 2024Stochastic Bandits for Egalitarian Assignmentcited by 4
  4. 2019Developments in Multi-Agent Fair Allocationcited by 3
  5. 2022On Average-Case Error Bounds for Kernel-Based Bayesian Quadraturecited by 3
  6. 2024Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocationscited by 3
  7. 2024Fair Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 3
  8. 2025Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learningcited by 3
  9. 2018Fairly Allocating Many Goods with Few Queriescited by 2
  10. 2023On the Optimal Bounds for Noisy Computingcited by 2
  11. 2017Communication Complexity of Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 1
  12. 2024Logarithmic Comparison-Based Query Complexity for Fair Division of Indivisible Goodscited by 1
  13. 2024Complexity of Round-Robin Allocation with Potentially Noisy Queriescited by 1
  14. 2025Bandit Max-Min Fair Allocationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.