Bandit Social Learning: Exploration under Myopic Behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study social learning dynamics motivated by reviews on online platforms. The agents collectively follow a simple multi-armed bandit protocol, but each agent acts myopically, without regards to exploration. We allow the greedy (exploitation-only) algorithm, as well as a wide range of behavioral biases. Specifically, we allow myopic behaviors that are consistent with (parameterized) confidence intervals for the arms' expected rewards. We derive stark learning failures for any such behavior, and provide matching positive results. The learning-failure results extend to Bayesian agents and Bayesian bandit environments. In particular, we obtain general, quantitatively strong results on failure of the greedy bandit algorithm, both for ``frequentist" and ``Bayesian" versions. Failure results known previously are quantitatively weak, and either trivial or very specialized. Thus, we provide a theoretical foundation for designing non-trivial bandit algorithms, ie algorithms that intentionally explore, which has been missing from the literature. Our general behavioral model can be interpreted as agents' optimism or pessimism. The matching positive results entail a maximal allowed amount of optimism. Moreover, we find that no amount of pessimism helps against the learning failures, whereas even a small-but-constant fraction of extreme optimists avoids the failures and leads to near-optimal regret rates.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2023.
Builds on
12 of 70 references.
References · 12
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2017Mostly Exploration-Free Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 85
- 2015Bayesian Incentive-Compatible Bandit Explorationcited by 53
- 2020The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Greedy Algorithms in Multi-Armed Bandit with Many Armscited by 27
- 2020The Price of Incentivizing Exploration: A Characterization via Thompson Sampling and Sample Complexitycited by 26
- 2018Incentivizing Exploration with Selective Data Disclosurecited by 24
- 2020Greedy Algorithm almost Dominates in Smoothed Contextual Banditscited by 20
- 2018The Externalities of Exploration and How Data Diversity Helps Exploitationcited by 19
- 2018On the Non-asymptotic and Sharp Lower Tail Bounds of Random Variablescited by 19
- 2015Incentivizing Exploration with Heterogeneous Value of Moneycited by 6
- 2021Be Greedy in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Can large language models explore in-context?cited by 75
- 2024Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Gamescited by 13
- 2025Greedy Algorithm for Structured Bandits: A Sharp Characterization of Asymptotic Success / Failurecited by 1
- 2023Incentivized Collaboration in Active Learningcited by 0
- 2024Dueling Over Dessert, Mastering the Art of Repeated Cake Cuttingcited by 0
- 2026Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queriescited by 0
- 2026Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queries6 Feb 2026
- 2025Greedy Algorithm for Structured Bandits: A Sharp Characterization of Asymptotic Success / Failure6 Mar 2025
- 2024Can large language models explore in-context?22 Mar 2024
- 2024Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Games6 Mar 2024
- 2024Dueling Over Dessert, Mastering the Art of Repeated Cake Cutting13 Feb 2024
- 2023Incentivized Collaboration in Active Learning1 Nov 2023