Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study online fair division when there are a finite number of item types and the player values for the items are drawn randomly from distributions with unknown means. In this setting, a sequence of indivisible items arrives according to a random online process, and each item must be allocated to a single player. The goal is to maximize expected social welfare while maintaining that the allocation satisfies proportionality in expectation. When player values are normalized, we show that it is possible to with high probability guarantee proportionality constraint satisfaction and achieve tildeO(√T) regret. To achieve this result, we present an upper confidence bound (UCB) algorithm that uses two rounds of linear optimization. This algorithm highlights fundamental aspects of proportionality constraints that allow for a UCB algorithm despite the presence of many (potentially tight) constraints. This result improves upon the previous best regret rate of tildeO(T2/3).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2025.
Builds on
21 of 27 references.
References · 21
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
- 2019Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraintscited by 90
- 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
- 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
- 2020Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 68
- 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 42
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 42
- 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 41
- 2021An Efficient Pessimistic-Optimistic Algorithm for Stochastic Linear Bandits with General Constraintscited by 29
- 2016Fair Algorithms for Infinite and Contextual Banditscited by 16
- 2023Pure Exploration in Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 10
9 more
- 2022Group Meritocratic Fairness in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 9
- 2023Best Arm Identification with Fairness Constraints on Subpopulationscited by 8
- 2023Learning Fair Division from Bandit Feedbackcited by 8
- 2020Fair and Efficient Online Allocations with Normalized Valuationscited by 7
- 2024Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Divisioncited by 7
- 2021Fairer LP-based Online Allocation via Analytic Centercited by 5
- 2019Justifications of Welfare Guarantees under Normalized Utilitiescited by 4
- 2023Fair Adaptive Experimentscited by 4
- 2024Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Informationcited by 6
- 2026Procedural Fairness in Multi-Agent Banditscited by 0
- 2026Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queriescited by 0
- 2026Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queries6 Feb 2026
- 2026Procedural Fairness in Multi-Agent Bandits15 Jan 2026
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Information30 May 2025