mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Fair Division from Bandit Feedback

arXiv 2311.09068 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work addresses learning online fair division under uncertainty, where a central planner sequentially allocates items without precise knowledge of agents' values or utilities. Departing from conventional online algorithm, the planner here relies on noisy, estimated values obtained after allocating items. We introduce wrapper algorithms utilizing textitdual averaging, enabling gradual learning of both the type distribution of arriving items and agents' values through bandit feedback. This approach enables the algorithms to asymptotically achieve optimal Nash social welfare in linear Fisher markets with agents having additive utilities. We establish regret bounds in Nash social welfare and empirically validate the superior performance of our proposed algorithms across synthetic and empirical datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 27 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2019Online Fair Division: A Surveycited by 16
  3. 2021Sequential Fair Allocation: Achieving the Optimal Envy-Efficiency Tradeoff Curvecited by 15
  4. 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Finite Stochastic Partial Monitoringcited by 10
  5. 2021Online Market Equilibrium with Application to Fair Divisioncited by 8
  6. 2022Nonstationary Dual Averaging and Online Fair Allocationcited by 5
  7. 2019Computing large market equilibria using abstractionscited by 4
  8. 2016Efficiency and Sequenceability in Fair Division of Indivisible Goods with Additive Preferencescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

8 papers.