mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocation

arXiv 2303.06396 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a fair resource allocation problem in the no-regret setting against an unrestricted adversary. The objective is to allocate resources equitably among several agents in an online fashion so that the difference of the aggregate α-fair utilities of the agents between an optimal static clairvoyant allocation and that of the online policy grows sub-linearly with time. The problem is challenging due to the non-additive nature of the α-fairness function. Previously, it was shown that no online policy can exist for this problem with a sublinear standard regret. In this paper, we propose an efficient online resource allocation policy, called Online Proportional Fair (OPF), that achieves cα-approximate sublinear regret with the approximation factor cα=(1-α)-(1-α)≤ 1.445, for 0≤ α < 1. The upper bound to the cα-regret for this problem exhibits a surprising phase transition phenomenon. The regret bound changes from a power-law to a constant at the critical exponent α=frac12. As a corollary, our result also resolves an open problem raised by Even-Dar et al. [2009] on designing an efficient no-regret policy for the online job scheduling problem in certain parameter regimes. The proof of our results introduces new algorithmic and analytical techniques, including greedy estimation of the future gradients for non-additive global reward functions and bootstrapping adaptive regret bounds, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2023.

Builds on

25 of 55 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  6. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  7. 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
  8. 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
  9. 2015An efficient algorithm for contextual bandits with knapsacks, and an extension to concave objectivescited by 43
  10. 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 41
  11. 2020Online Learning with Imperfect Hintscited by 37
  12. 2020Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyondcited by 22
13 more
  1. 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 21
  2. 2020Online Nash Social Welfare Maximization with Predictionscited by 15
  3. 2021Sequential Fair Allocation: Achieving the Optimal Envy-Efficiency Tradeoff Curvecited by 15
  4. 2022Enabling Long-term Fairness in Dynamic Resource Allocationcited by 15
  5. 2020LeadCache: Regret-Optimal Caching in Networkscited by 14
  6. 2022Optimistic No-regret Algorithms for Discrete Cachingcited by 10
  7. 2021ktexttt-experts -- Online Policies and Fundamental Limitscited by 8
  8. 2014Online Dating Recommendations: Matching Markets and Learning Preferencescited by 6
  9. 2021Fairness Maximization among Offline Agents in Online-Matching Marketscited by 6
  10. 2023Group fairness in dynamic refugee assignmentcited by 6
  11. 2022Individual Fairness in Prophet Inequalitiescited by 5
  12. 2020Birkhoff's Decomposition Revisited: Sparse Scheduling for High-Speed Circuit Switchescited by 4
  13. 2022Universal Cachingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

9 papers.