mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Vision Language Models Learn Intuitive Physics from Interaction?

arXiv 2602.06033 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained vision language models do not have good intuitions about the physical world. Recent work has shown that supervised fine-tuning can improve model performance on simple physical tasks. However, fine-tuned models do not appear to learn robust physical rules that can generalize to new contexts. Based on research in cognitive science, we hypothesize that models need to interact with an environment to properly learn its physical dynamics. We train models that learn through interaction with a simulated environment using reinforcement learning. While learning from interaction allows models to improve their within-task performance, it fails to produce models with generalizable physical intuitions. We find that models trained on one task do not reliably generalize to related tasks, even if the tasks share visual statistics and physical principles, and regardless of whether the models are trained through interaction.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

38 of 71 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025From Diagnosis to Improvement: Probing Spatio-Physical Reasoning in Vision Language Models14 Aug
  2. 2025Pixels to Principles: Probing Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multimodal Language Models22 Jul
  3. 2025Do Vision-Language Models Have Internal World Models? Towards an Atomic Evaluation27 Jun
  4. 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models11 Dec

Other references · 34

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  6. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  7. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
  8. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  9. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
  10. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  11. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
  12. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
22 more
  1. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
  2. 2020ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulationcited by 249
  3. 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 247
  4. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  5. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 144
  6. 2024SceneVerse: Scaling 3D Vision-Language Learning for Grounded Scene Understandingcited by 130
  7. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  8. 2023CLadder: Assessing Causal Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 102
  9. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 71
  10. 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
  11. 2024Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Modelscited by 60
  12. 2022Structured, flexible, and robust: benchmarking and improving large language models towards more human-like behavior in out-of-distribution reasoning taskscited by 56
  13. 2021The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  14. 2023Visual cognition in multimodal large language modelscited by 38
  15. 2024Centaur: a foundation model of human cognitioncited by 34
  16. 2024Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 29
  17. 2024LVLM-COUNT: Enhancing the Counting Ability of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 20
  18. 2025Your Vision-Language Model Can't Even Count to 20: Exposing the Failures of VLMs in Compositional Countingcited by 17
  19. 2024A little less conversation, a little more action, please: Investigating the physical common-sense of LLMs in a 3D embodied environmentcited by 13
  20. 2025Vision-Language Model for Object Detection and Segmentation: A Review and Evaluationcited by 10
  21. 2025Testing the Limits of Fine-Tuning for Improving Visual Cognition in Vision Language Modelscited by 4
  22. 2024Object permanence in newborn chicks is robust against opposing evidencecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025WoW: Towards a World omniscient World model Through Embodied Interaction
  2. 2023Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts?
  3. 2025Physics Knowledge in Frontier Models: A Diagnostic Study of Failure Modes
  4. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding
  5. 2026PhysBrain 1.5: From Vision-Language Models to Physical Foundation Models
  6. 2026ICPRL: Acquiring Physical Intuition from Interactive Control
  7. 2026From Perception to Action: An Interactive Benchmark for Vision Reasoning
  8. 2026Vision Language Models Cannot Reason About Physical Transformation