mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution

arXiv 2601.20232 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) adapts a frozen Vision Transformer (ViT) to downstream tasks by inserting a small number of learnable prompt tokens into the token sequence at each layer. However, we observe that existing VPT variants often suffer from unstable training dynamics, characterized by gradient oscillations. A layer-wise analysis reveals that shallow-layer prompts tend to stagnate early, while deeper-layer prompts exhibit high-variance oscillations, leading to cross-layer mismatch. These issues slow convergence and degrade final performance. To address these challenges, we propose Prompt-Agnostic Evolution (mathttPAE), which strengthens vision prompt tuning by explicitly modeling prompt dynamics. From a frequency-domain perspective, we initialize prompts in a task-aware direction by uncovering and propagating frequency shortcut patterns that the backbone inherently exploits for recognition. To ensure coherent evolution across layers, we employ a shared Koopman operator that imposes a global linear transformation instead of uncoordinated, layer-specific updates. Finally, inspired by Lyapunov stability theory, we introduce a regularizer that constrains error amplification during evolution. Extensive experiments show that mathttPAE accelerates convergence with an average 1.41× speedup and improves accuracy by 1-3% on 25 datasets across multiple downstream tasks. Beyond performance, mathttPAE is prompt-agnostic and lightweight, and it integrates seamlessly with diverse VPT variants without backbone modification or inference-time changes.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

46 of 63 references.

References · 46

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  7. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  8. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  9. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  10. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  11. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  12. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
34 more
  1. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  2. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,113
  3. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
  4. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
  5. 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 441
  6. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  7. 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 340
  8. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Generative Transfer Learningcited by 75
  10. 2023Sensitivity-Aware Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  11. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  12. 2022LPT: Long-tailed Prompt Tuning for Image Classificationcited by 69
  13. 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57
  14. 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
  15. 2023Progressive Visual Prompt Learning with Contrastive Feature Re-formationcited by 35
  16. 2024Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuningcited by 32
  17. 2024Visual Fourier Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  18. 2025Visual Instance-aware Prompt Tuningcited by 29
  19. 2023What do neural networks learn in image classification? A frequency shortcut perspectivecited by 28
  20. 2024MANTA: A Large-Scale Multi-View and Visual-Text Anomaly Detection Dataset for Tiny Objectscited by 26
  21. 2025Prompt-based Adaptation in Large-scale Vision Models: A Surveycited by 21
  22. 2024Seeing the Unseen: A Frequency Prompt Guided Transformer for Image Restorationcited by 18
  23. 2023STA-VPT: SpatioTemporally Aligned Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 17
  24. 2025DA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision Transformerscited by 17
  25. 2025HSSBench: Benchmarking Humanities and Social Sciences Ability for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 17
  26. 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
  27. 2024Salvaging the Overlooked: Leveraging Class-Aware Contrastive Learning for Multi-Class Anomaly Detectioncited by 15
  28. 2023Spectral Prompt Tuning:Unveiling Unseen Classes for Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 11
  29. 2025Interpretable Image Classification via Non-parametric Part Prototype Learningcited by 11
  30. 2025Visual Variational Autoencoder Prompt Tuningcited by 8
  31. 2025All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vectorcited by 8
  32. 2025Do ImageNet-trained models learn shortcuts? The impact of frequency shortcuts on generalizationcited by 5
  33. 2025Attention to the Burstiness in Visual Prompt Tuning!cited by 4
  34. 2023What Happens During Finetuning of Vision Transformers: An Invariance Based Investigationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.