Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) adapts a frozen Vision Transformer (ViT) to downstream tasks by inserting a small number of learnable prompt tokens into the token sequence at each layer. However, we observe that existing VPT variants often suffer from unstable training dynamics, characterized by gradient oscillations. A layer-wise analysis reveals that shallow-layer prompts tend to stagnate early, while deeper-layer prompts exhibit high-variance oscillations, leading to cross-layer mismatch. These issues slow convergence and degrade final performance. To address these challenges, we propose Prompt-Agnostic Evolution (mathttPAE), which strengthens vision prompt tuning by explicitly modeling prompt dynamics. From a frequency-domain perspective, we initialize prompts in a task-aware direction by uncovering and propagating frequency shortcut patterns that the backbone inherently exploits for recognition. To ensure coherent evolution across layers, we employ a shared Koopman operator that imposes a global linear transformation instead of uncoordinated, layer-specific updates. Finally, inspired by Lyapunov stability theory, we introduce a regularizer that constrains error amplification during evolution. Extensive experiments show that mathttPAE accelerates convergence with an average 1.41× speedup and improves accuracy by 1-3% on 25 datasets across multiple downstream tasks. Beyond performance, mathttPAE is prompt-agnostic and lightweight, and it integrates seamlessly with diverse VPT variants without backbone modification or inference-time changes.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
46 of 63 references.
References · 46
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
- 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
34 more
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,113
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
- 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
- 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 441
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
- 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 340
- 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Generative Transfer Learningcited by 75
- 2023Sensitivity-Aware Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 74
- 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
- 2022LPT: Long-tailed Prompt Tuning for Image Classificationcited by 69
- 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57
- 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
- 2023Progressive Visual Prompt Learning with Contrastive Feature Re-formationcited by 35
- 2024Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuningcited by 32
- 2024Visual Fourier Prompt Tuningcited by 30
- 2025Visual Instance-aware Prompt Tuningcited by 29
- 2023What do neural networks learn in image classification? A frequency shortcut perspectivecited by 28
- 2024MANTA: A Large-Scale Multi-View and Visual-Text Anomaly Detection Dataset for Tiny Objectscited by 26
- 2025Prompt-based Adaptation in Large-scale Vision Models: A Surveycited by 21
- 2024Seeing the Unseen: A Frequency Prompt Guided Transformer for Image Restorationcited by 18
- 2023STA-VPT: SpatioTemporally Aligned Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 17
- 2025DA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision Transformerscited by 17
- 2025HSSBench: Benchmarking Humanities and Social Sciences Ability for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2024Salvaging the Overlooked: Leveraging Class-Aware Contrastive Learning for Multi-Class Anomaly Detectioncited by 15
- 2023Spectral Prompt Tuning:Unveiling Unseen Classes for Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 11
- 2025Interpretable Image Classification via Non-parametric Part Prototype Learningcited by 11
- 2025Visual Variational Autoencoder Prompt Tuningcited by 8
- 2025All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vectorcited by 8
- 2025Do ImageNet-trained models learn shortcuts? The impact of frequency shortcuts on generalizationcited by 5
- 2025Attention to the Burstiness in Visual Prompt Tuning!cited by 4
- 2023What Happens During Finetuning of Vision Transformers: An Invariance Based Investigationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.