All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vector
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prompt-based learning has emerged as a parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) approach to facilitate Large Language Model (LLM) adaptation to downstream tasks by conditioning generation with task-aware guidance. Despite its successes, current prompt-based learning methods heavily rely on laborious grid searching for optimal prompt length and typically require considerable number of prompts, introducing additional computational burden. Worse yet, our pioneer findings indicate that the task-aware prompt design is inherently limited by its absence of instance-aware information, leading to a subtle attention interplay with the input sequence. In contrast, simply incorporating instance-aware information as a part of the guidance can enhance the prompt-tuned model performance without additional fine-tuning. Moreover, we find an interesting phenomenon, namely "attention anchor", that incorporating instance-aware tokens at the earliest position of the sequence can successfully preserve strong attention to critical structural information and exhibit more active attention interaction with all input tokens. In light of our observation, we introduce Capsule Prompt-Tuning (CaPT), an efficient and effective solution that leverages off-the-shelf, informative instance semantics into prompt-based learning. Our approach innovatively integrates both instance-aware and task-aware information in a nearly parameter-free manner (i.e., one single capsule prompt). Empirical results demonstrate that our method can exhibit superior performance across various language tasks (e.g., 84.03% average accuracy on T5-Large), serving as an "attention anchor," while enjoying high parameter efficiency (e.g., 0.003% of model parameters on Llama3.2-1B).
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 82 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.
Builds on
82 of 98 references.
References · 82
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
38 more
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2020CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languagescited by 1,286
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 553
- 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
- 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 329
- 2021Deep Residual Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 326
- 2023The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in Transformerscited by 319
- 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 227
- 2020Rethinking Positional Encoding in Language Pre-trainingcited by 197
- 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2023LM-Infinite: Zero-Shot Extreme Length Generalization for Large Language Modelscited by 120
- 2023Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 90
- 2021Why Do Pretrained Language Models Help in Downstream Tasks? An Analysis of Head and Prompt Tuningcited by 82
- 2022Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?cited by 76
- 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
- 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 70
- 2024Attention Heads of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 65
- 2021Prompt Waywardness: The Curious Case of Discretized Interpretation of Continuous Promptscited by 64
- 2023Residual Prompt Tuning: Improving Prompt Tuning with Residual Reparameterizationcited by 64
50 most cited of 82 All 82 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Not All Directions Matter: Towards Structured and Task-Aware Low-Rank Model Adaptationcited by 11
- 2026Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolutioncited by 2
- 2026Attention Sinks Induce Gradient Sinks: Massive Activations as Gradient Regulators in Transformerscited by 2
- 2026Dynamic Cross-Modal Prompt Generation for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuningcited by 2
- 2026Layer-Specific Prompt Fusion Discovery via Differentiable Search in Vision Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2026TokenSeek: Memory Efficient Fine Tuning via Instance-Aware Token Ditchingcited by 0
- 2026UniMem: Complementary Episodic-to-Parametric Memory for Boundary-Agnostic Task Streamscited by 0
- 2026Adapting Vision Foundation Models with Cascaded Semanticscited by 0
- 2026Adapting Vision Foundation Models with Cascaded Semantics5 Aug 2026
- 2026UniMem: Complementary Episodic-to-Parametric Memory for Boundary-Agnostic Task Streams28 Jul 2026
- 2026Layer-Specific Prompt Fusion Discovery via Differentiable Search in Vision Foundation Models24 Jun 2026
- 2026Dynamic Cross-Modal Prompt Generation for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning11 May 2026
- 2026Attention Sinks Induce Gradient Sinks: Massive Activations as Gradient Regulators in Transformers18 Mar 2026
- 2026Not All Directions Matter: Towards Structured and Task-Aware Low-Rank Model Adaptation15 Mar 2026
- 2026Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution28 Jan 2026
- 2026TokenSeek: Memory Efficient Fine Tuning via Instance-Aware Token Ditching27 Jan 2026