mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attention to the Burstiness in Visual Prompt Tuning!

arXiv 2506.22908 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) is a parameter-efficient fune-tuning technique that adapts a pre-trained vision Transformer (ViT) by learning a small set of parameters in the input space, known as prompts. In VPT, we uncover ``burstiness'' in the values arising from the interaction of image patch embeddings, and the key and query projectors within Transformer's self-attention module. Furthermore, the values of patch embeddings and the key and query projectors exhibit Laplacian and hyper-Laplacian distribution, respectively. Intuitively, these non-Gaussian distributions pose challenges for learning prompts. To address this, we propose whitening these data, de-correlating them and equalizing their variance towards more Gaussian before learning prompts. We derive the whitening matrix over random image patch embeddings and ViT's key and query projectors, and multiply it with the prompt to be learned in a bilinear manner. Surprisingly, this method significantly accelerates prompt tuning and boosts accuracy, e.g., >25 accuracy points on the CUB dataset; interestingly, it learns ``bursty prompts''. Extending the bilinear model which is known to introduce burstiness, we present a compact, low-rank version by learning two smaller matrices whose multiplication yields the final prompts. We call the proposed methods Bilinear Prompt Tuning (BPT). Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that BPT methods not only outperform various VPT methods but also reduce parameter count and computation overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2025.

Builds on

50 of 75 references.

References · 50

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  8. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  11. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  12. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
38 more
  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  7. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  8. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  9. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  10. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  11. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,382
  12. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  13. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  14. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  15. 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 724
  16. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  17. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  18. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 429
  19. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  20. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
  21. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
  22. 2015Bilinear CNNs for Fine-grained Visual Recognitioncited by 228
  23. 2018Dynamical Isometry and a Mean Field Theory of CNNs: How to Train 10,000-Layer Vanilla Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  24. 2022Contrastive Masked Autoencoders are Stronger Vision Learnerscited by 133
  25. 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
  26. 2015Optimal whitening and decorrelationcited by 97
  27. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  28. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  29. 2023The effectiveness of MAE pre-pretraining for billion-scale pretrainingcited by 68
  30. 2024The Neglected Tails in Vision-Language Modelscited by 63
  31. 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57
  32. 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
  33. 2016Low-rank Bilinear Pooling for Fine-Grained Classificationcited by 42
  34. 2024Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuningcited by 32
  35. 2017Improved Bilinear Pooling with CNNscited by 29
  36. 2024Few-Shot Recognition via Stage-Wise Retrieval-Augmented Finetuningcited by 15
  37. 2018A Deeper Look at Power Normalizationscited by 12
  38. 2023Tuning Pre-trained Model via Moment Probingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.