Do ImageNet-trained models learn shortcuts? The impact of frequency shortcuts on generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frequency shortcuts refer to specific frequency patterns that models heavily rely on for correct classification. Previous studies have shown that models trained on small image datasets often exploit such shortcuts, potentially impairing their generalization performance. However, existing methods for identifying frequency shortcuts require expensive computations and become impractical for analyzing models trained on large datasets. In this work, we propose the first approach to more efficiently analyze frequency shortcuts at a large scale. We show that both CNN and transformer models learn frequency shortcuts on ImageNet. We also expose that frequency shortcut solutions can yield good performance on out-of-distribution (OOD) test sets which largely retain texture information. However, these shortcuts, mostly aligned with texture patterns, hinder model generalization on rendition-based OOD test sets. These observations suggest that current OOD evaluations often overlook the impact of frequency shortcuts on model generalization. Future benchmarks could thus benefit from explicitly assessing and accounting for these shortcuts to build models that generalize across a broader range of OOD scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.
Builds on
34 of 43 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
- 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 368
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
22 more
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 267
- 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 264
- 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
- 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
- 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 193
- 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 174
- 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 119
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 117
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 97
- 2023Not All Neuro-Symbolic Concepts Are Created Equal: Analysis and Mitigation of Reasoning Shortcutscited by 63
- 2020Automatic Shortcut Removal for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 43
- 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
- 2021A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustnesscited by 42
- 2020Deep frequency principle towards understanding why deeper learning is fastercited by 31
- 2023What do neural networks learn in image classification? A frequency shortcut perspectivecited by 28
- 2023A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptionscited by 21
- 2024Can Biases in ImageNet Models Explain Generalization?cited by 20
- 2019Understanding Bias in Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2021A Too-Good-to-be-True Prior to Reduce Shortcut Reliancecited by 7
- 2023DFM-X: Augmentation by Leveraging Prior Knowledge of Shortcut Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolutioncited by 2
- 2026Rendering-Aware Bayesian 3D Gaussian Splatting with Native Uncertainty and Adaptive Complexity Controlcited by 2
- 2026Less is More in Semantic Space: Intrinsic Decoupling via Clifford-M for Fundus Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Low-Frequency Shortcuts in Texture-Driven Visual Learningcited by 0
- 2026Invisible Shortcuts: Why Vision Encoders Know Your Cameracited by 0
- 2026Invisible Shortcuts: Why Vision Encoders Know Your Camera5 Aug 2026
- 2026Rendering-Aware Bayesian 3D Gaussian Splatting with Native Uncertainty and Adaptive Complexity Control6 Jul 2026
- 2026Low-Frequency Shortcuts in Texture-Driven Visual Learning2 Jun 2026
- 2026Less is More in Semantic Space: Intrinsic Decoupling via Clifford-M for Fundus Image Classification21 Mar 2026
- 2026Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution28 Jan 2026