mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STA-VPT: SpatioTemporally Aligned Visual Prompt Tuning

arXiv 2312.10376 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 17

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Multimodal MoE models

Abstract (arXiv)

Typical methods for visual prompt tuning follow the sequential modeling paradigm originating from NLP, learning a sequence of unordered parameterized tokens as visual prompts, which are then prefixed to the flattened image representation for model adaptation. While such a sequential prompting paradigm has exhibited great promise, it presents two potential limitations. First, the learned visual prompts, presented in an unordered sequential form, are unable to capture the underlying spatial relations in the input image which are crucial for effective image encoding. Second, all prompt tokens serve the same role by performing uniform prompting for all image tokens without distinction, lacking fine-grained prompting capability---i.e., individualized prompting for different visual tokens to capture region-specific semantic patterns. In this work, we introduce the mymodel model (STA-VPT), a novel visual prompting paradigm, which learns a two-dimensional prompt token map for image prompting or a three-dimensional token volume for video prompting, ensuring spatial (or spatiotemporal) alignment with the input image token map (or video token volume). This alignment enables the visual prompts to preserve the spatial (or spatiotemporal) structure, thereby learning the underlying relations within the visual input. Furthermore, each prompt token serves as a specialized prompting expert and is designated to exclusively prompt for the spatially (or spatiotemporally) corresponding visual tokens. Consequently, our STA-VPT is capable of performing individualized prompting for different spatiotemporal regions, potentially improving the prompting performance through fine-grained allocation of prompting capacity, in line with mixture of experts (MoE) principles.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal MoE models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 44 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2023.

Builds on

44 of 68 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  10. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  11. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  12. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
32 more
  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  2. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  4. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  5. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  6. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  7. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  8. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  9. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  10. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  11. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
  12. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  13. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 899
  14. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
  15. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  16. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  17. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  18. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 553
  19. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
  20. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  21. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
  22. 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 248
  23. 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
  24. 2022ST-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 192
  25. 2023AIM: Adapting Image Models for Efficient Video Action Recognitioncited by 145
  26. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  27. 2023Sensitivity-Aware Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  28. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  29. 2023Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Promptingcited by 57
  30. 2023Dual-path Adaptation from Image to Video Transformerscited by 40
  31. 2023Gradient-based Parameter Selection for Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 40
  32. 2023Learning Expressive Prompting With Residuals for Vision Transformerscited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation
  2. 2024Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
  3. 2024Exploring the Transferability of Visual Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2025FedMVP: Federated Multimodal Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2023Tuning Multi-mode Token-level Prompt Alignment across Modalities
  6. 2025STOP: Integrated Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Prompting for Video Understanding
  7. 2023ViP-LLaVA: Making Large Multimodal Models Understand Arbitrary Visual Prompts
  8. 2021CPT: Colorful Prompt Tuning for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models