RGBT-GroundBench: Visual Grounding Beyond RGB in Complex Real-World Scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual grounding (VG) localizes target objects in an image from natural-language expressions. In real-world perception, RGB cues often degrade under low illumination and adverse weather, making visual grounding substantially more challenging. However, existing VG benchmarks are largely RGB-only and provide limited, structured coverage of such conditions, hindering systematic robustness evaluation and cross-spectral comparison. We present RGBT-GroundBench, the first large-scale benchmark for RGB-Thermal (TIR) visual grounding in complex environments. It contains over 40K images (21,535 RGB-TIR pairs) and 38,760 object instances with referring expressions, bounding boxes, and fine-grained annotations at three levels: scene types, environmental conditions (illumination and weather), and object properties (size and occlusion). As a benchmark suite, RGBT-GroundBench provides not only curated RGB-TIR grounding annotations but also a unified evaluation protocol supporting RGB-only, TIR-only, and RGB+TIR inputs. Under this protocol, we benchmark 11 representative VG models across diverse scenes and environmental conditions. Our results show that grounding accuracy is strongly correlated with scene complexity, LoRA-based models are more robust in complex scenes, and low-illumination conditions cause significant performance degradation that has been rarely explored. Guided by these observations, we introduce RGBT-VGNet, a simple and reproducible reference baseline under the unified protocol, featuring Asymmetric Modality Adaptation, Language-Aware Visual Synergy, and Tri-Prior Fusion for reliability-aware RGB-TIR integration. Resources, annotations, code, checkpoints, and evaluation scripts have been publicly released.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2025.
Builds on
42 of 63 references.
References · 42
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
- 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
- 2020Large-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation Learningcited by 327
30 more
- 2022Target-aware Dual Adversarial Learning and a Multi-scenario Multi-Modality Benchmark to Fuse Infrared and Visible for Object Detectioncited by 313
- 2021TransVG: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Transformerscited by 269
- 2016Modeling Context Between Objects for Referring Expression Understandingcited by 250
- 2022mPLUG: Effective and Efficient Vision-Language Learning by Cross-modal Skip-connectionscited by 185
- 2020Improving One-stage Visual Grounding by Recursive Sub-query Constructioncited by 137
- 2021UniTAB: Unifying Text and Box Outputs for Grounded Vision-Language Modelingcited by 122
- 2020Multispectral Fusion for Object Detection with Cyclic Fuse-and-Refine Blockscited by 85
- 2025Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Groundingcited by 78
- 2022UniT3D: A Unified Transformer for 3D Dense Captioning and Visual Groundingcited by 69
- 2023C2Former: Calibrated and Complementary Transformer for RGB-Infrared Object Detectioncited by 57
- 2022Shifting More Attention to Visual Backbone: Query-modulated Refinement Networks for End-to-End Visual Groundingcited by 52
- 2024Toward Visual Grounding: A Surveycited by 52
- 2022RGB-T Semantic Segmentation with Location, Activation, and Sharpeningcited by 39
- 2023CLIP-VG: Self-paced Curriculum Adapting of CLIP for Visual Groundingcited by 35
- 2021Refer-it-in-RGBD: A Bottom-up Approach for 3D Visual Grounding in RGBD Imagescited by 33
- 2024F-LMM: Grounding Frozen Large Multimodal Modelscited by 33
- 2024HiVG: Hierarchical Multimodal Fine-grained Modulation for Visual Groundingcited by 31
- 2022Dynamic MDETR: A Dynamic Multimodal Transformer Decoder for Visual Groundingcited by 29
- 2024OneRef: Unified One-tower Expression Grounding and Segmentation with Mask Referring Modelingcited by 28
- 2023Advancing Visual Grounding with Scene Knowledge: Benchmark and Methodcited by 17
- 2024Removal then Selection: A Coarse-to-Fine Fusion Perspective for RGB-Infrared Object Detectioncited by 16
- 2024UniRGB-IR: A Unified Framework for Visible-Infrared Semantic Tasks via Adapter Tuningcited by 16
- 2024Visual Grounding with Multi-modal Conditional Adaptationcited by 12
- 2025Rethinking Multi-Modal Object Detection from the Perspective of Mono-Modality Feature Learningcited by 11
- 2023Cross3DVG: Cross-Dataset 3D Visual Grounding on Different RGB-D Scanscited by 10
- 2024D3T: Distinctive Dual-Domain Teacher Zigzagging Across RGB-Thermal Gap for Domain-Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 9
- 2025LLaVA-SP: Enhancing Visual Representation with Visual Spatial Tokens for MLLMscited by 8
- 2024Visual Grounding with Attention-Driven Constraint Balancingcited by 7
- 2025Seeing Through the Noise: Improving Infrared Small Target Detection and Segmentation from Noise Suppression Perspectivecited by 7
- 2025A Simple and Better Baseline for Visual Groundingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Pix2Fact: When Vision Is Not Enough -- Benchmarking Fine-Grained VQA with Web Verification on High-Resolution Real-World Scenescited by 3
- 2026OmniSch: A Multimodal PCB Schematic Benchmark For Structured Diagram Visual Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026Groundbench: Multi-Resolution Polygon Grounding Exposes the Geometry Gap in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Groundbench: Multi-Resolution Polygon Grounding Exposes the Geometry Gap in Vision-Language Models18 Aug 2026
- 2026OmniSch: A Multimodal PCB Schematic Benchmark For Structured Diagram Visual Reasoning31 Mar 2026
- 2026Pix2Fact: When Vision Is Not Enough -- Benchmarking Fine-Grained VQA with Web Verification on High-Resolution Real-World Scenes31 Jan 2026