mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Simple and Better Baseline for Visual Grounding

arXiv 2510.10587 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual grounding aims to predict the locations of target objects specified by textual descriptions. For this task with linguistic and visual modalities, there is a latest research line that focuses on only selecting the linguistic-relevant visual regions for object localization to reduce the computational overhead. Albeit achieving impressive performance, it is iteratively performed on different image scales, and at every iteration, linguistic features and visual features need to be stored in a cache, incurring extra overhead. To facilitate the implementation, in this paper, we propose a feature selection-based simple yet effective baseline for visual grounding, called FSVG. Specifically, we directly encapsulate the linguistic and visual modalities into an overall network architecture without complicated iterative procedures, and utilize the language in parallel as guidance to facilitate the interaction between linguistic modal and visual modal for extracting effective visual features. Furthermore, to reduce the computational cost, during the visual feature learning, we introduce a similarity-based feature selection mechanism to only exploit language-related visual features for faster prediction. Extensive experiments conducted on several benchmark datasets comprehensively substantiate that the proposed FSVG achieves a better balance between accuracy and efficiency beyond the current state-of-the-art methods. Code is available at https://github.com/jcwang0602/FSVG.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  4. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  5. 2021TransVG: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Transformerscited by 269
  6. 2016Modeling Context Between Objects for Referring Expression Understandingcited by 250
  7. 2021Referring Transformer: A One-step Approach to Multi-task Visual Groundingcited by 143
  8. 2022SeqTR: A Simple yet Universal Network for Visual Groundingcited by 138
  9. 2019Learning to Compose and Reason with Language Tree Structures for Visual Groundingcited by 98
  10. 2022Shifting More Attention to Visual Backbone: Query-modulated Refinement Networks for End-to-End Visual Groundingcited by 52
  11. 2021Look Before You Leap: Learning Landmark Features for One-Stage Visual Groundingcited by 51
  12. 2022TransVG++: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Language Conditioned Vision Transformercited by 41
11 more
  1. 2023CLIP-VG: Self-paced Curriculum Adapting of CLIP for Visual Groundingcited by 35
  2. 2023Language Adaptive Weight Generation for Multi-task Visual Groundingcited by 35
  3. 2019A Real-time Global Inference Network for One-stage Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 32
  4. 2023Parallel Vertex Diffusion for Unified Visual Groundingcited by 28
  5. 2023Zero-shot Referring Expression Comprehension via Structural Similarity Between Images and Captionscited by 21
  6. 2024ScanFormer: Referring Expression Comprehension by Iteratively Scanningcited by 18
  7. 2023Advancing Visual Grounding with Scene Knowledge: Benchmark and Methodcited by 17
  8. 2023Improved Visual Grounding through Self-Consistent Explanationscited by 17
  9. 2021Word2Pix: Word to Pixel Cross Attention Transformer in Visual Groundingcited by 16
  10. 2023Referring Expression Comprehension Using Language Adaptive Inferencecited by 15
  11. 2023Cycle-Consistency Learning for Captioning and Groundingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.