Calibrating LLM Judges: Linear Probes for Fast and Reliable Uncertainty Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As LLM-based judges become integral to industry applications, obtaining well-calibrated uncertainty estimates efficiently has become critical for production deployment. However, existing techniques, such as verbalized confidence and multi-generation methods, are often either poorly calibrated or computationally expensive. We introduce linear probes trained with a Brier score-based loss to provide calibrated uncertainty estimates from reasoning judges' hidden states, requiring no additional model training. We evaluate our approach on both objective tasks (reasoning, mathematics, factuality, coding) and subjective human preference judgments. Our results demonstrate that probes achieve superior calibration compared to existing methods with ≈10x computational savings, generalize robustly to unseen evaluation domains, and deliver higher accuracy on high-confidence predictions. However, probes produce conservative estimates that underperform on easier datasets but may benefit safety-critical deployments prioritizing low false-positive rates. Overall, our work demonstrates that interpretability-based uncertainty estimation provides a practical and scalable plug-and-play solution for LLM judges in production.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2025.
Builds on
51 of 76 references.
References · 51
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
38 more
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
- 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
- 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 294
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
- 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 224
- 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verificationcited by 154
- 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
- 2023Quantifying Uncertainty in Answers from any Language Model and Enhancing their Trustworthinesscited by 121
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
- 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 99
- 2023Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt Engineeringcited by 91
- 2024How to Evaluate Reward Models for RLHFcited by 84
- 2025JudgeLRM: Large Reasoning Models as a Judgecited by 76
- 2024Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistencycited by 72
- 2024Calibrating Language Models with Adaptive Temperature Scalingcited by 57
- 2024Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluationcited by 56
- 2025Calibrating Verbal Uncertainty as a Linear Feature to Reduce Hallucinationscited by 48
- 2024Diverging Preferences: When do Annotators Disagree and do Models Know?cited by 47
- 2025ConfTuner: Training Large Language Models to Express Their Confidence Verballycited by 37
- 2022Metrics of calibration for probabilistic predictionscited by 31
- 2024Calibrating Reasoning in Language Models with Internal Consistencycited by 27
- 2024Mitigating the Bias of Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 17
- 2025Overconfidence in LLM-as-a-Judge: Diagnosis and Confidence-Driven Solutioncited by 17
- 2024Probabilities of Chat LLMs Are Miscalibrated but Still Predict Correctness on Multiple-Choice Q&Acited by 16
- 2024What makes a good metric? Evaluating automatic metrics for text-to-image consistencycited by 11
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Calibrate, Don't Curate: Label-Efficient Estimation from Noisy LLM Judgescited by 4
- 2026A Finite-Calibration Regime Map for LLM Judge Panelscited by 2
- 2026Towards Provably Unbiased LLM Judges via Bias-Bounded Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026Breaking the Solver Bottleneck: Training Task Generators at the Learnable Frontiercited by 1
- 2026VERDI: Single-Call Confidence Estimation for Verification-Based LLM Judges via Decomposed Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Calibration, Not Answer Selection: Distilling Internal Confidence in Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Calibration, Not Answer Selection: Distilling Internal Confidence in Reasoning Models27 Sep 2026
- 2026Breaking the Solver Bottleneck: Training Task Generators at the Learnable Frontier10 Jun 2026
- 2026A Finite-Calibration Regime Map for LLM Judge Panels31 May 2026
- 2026VERDI: Single-Call Confidence Estimation for Verification-Based LLM Judges via Decomposed Inference11 May 2026
- 2026Calibrate, Don't Curate: Label-Efficient Estimation from Noisy LLM Judges10 May 2026
- 2026Towards Provably Unbiased LLM Judges via Bias-Bounded Evaluation5 Mar 2026