mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

QuantiPhy: A Quantitative Benchmark Evaluating Physical Reasoning Abilities of Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2512.19526 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 20

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the physical world is essential for generalist AI agents. However, it remains unclear whether state-of-the-art vision perception models (e.g., large VLMs) can reason physical properties quantitatively. Existing evaluations are predominantly VQA-based and qualitative, offering limited insight into whether these models can infer the kinematic quantities of moving objects from video observations. To address this, we present QuantiPhy, the first benchmark designed to quantitatively measure a VLM's physical reasoning ability. Comprising more than 3.3K video-text instances with numerical ground truth, QuantiPhy evaluates a VLM's performance on estimating an object's size, velocity, and acceleration at a given timestamp, using one of these properties as an input prior. The benchmark standardizes prompts and scoring to assess numerical accuracy, enabling fair comparisons across models. Our experiments on state-of-the-art VLMs reveal a consistent gap between their qualitative plausibility and actual numerical correctness. We further provide an in-depth analysis of key factors like background noise, counterfactual priors, and strategic prompting and find that state-of-the-art VLMs lean heavily on pre-trained world knowledge rather than faithfully using the provided visual and textual inputs as references when reasoning kinematic properties quantitatively. QuantiPhy offers the first rigorous, scalable testbed to move VLMs beyond mere verbal plausibility toward a numerically grounded physical understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

Builds on

16 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoning7 Aug
  2. 2025Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning18 Mar
  3. 2024ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from Videos9 Feb

Other references · 13

  1. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  4. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  5. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  6. 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 692
  7. 2024DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 490
  8. 2024STAR: A Benchmark for Situated Reasoning in Real-World Videoscited by 213
  9. 2025VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generationcited by 149
  10. 2025Cambrian-S: Towards Spatial Supersensing in Videocited by 134
  11. 2024Grounding DINO 1.5: Advance the "Edge" of Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 122
  12. 2025Holistic Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs on Spatial Intelligencecited by 29
1 more
  1. 2023Wild2Avatar: Rendering Humans Behind Occlusionscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 19.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Code as Worlds: Agentic Discovery of Executable World Representations for Physical Reasoningcited by 14
  2. 2026OmniFysics: Towards Physical Intelligence Evolution via Omni-Modal Signal Processing and Network Optimizationcited by 5
  3. 2026Picasso: Holistic Scene Reconstruction with Physics-Constrained Samplingcited by 4
  4. 2026PhysMind: From Video to Executable Worlds for Training-Free Physical Reasoningcited by 4
  5. 2025Agentic Physical AI toward a Domain-Specific Foundation Model for Energy Systems: A Case Study on Nuclear Reactor Controlcited by 3
  6. 20264DCodeBench: Benchmarking Agents on Inverse Graphics of Dynamic Scenescited by 3
  7. 2026EgoDyn-Bench: Evaluating Ego-Motion Understanding in Vision-Centric Foundation Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 2
  8. 2026PhysEditWorld: A Large-Scale Dataset Toward Physics-Editable World Modelscited by 2
  9. 2026SeePhys Pro: Diagnosing Modality Transfer and Blind-Training Effects in Multimodal RLVR for Physics Reasoningcited by 1
  10. 2026Do Physics Foundation Models Learn Generalizable Physics? A Bias-Aware Benchmark Across Physical Regimes and Distribution Shiftscited by 1
  11. 2026BilliardPhys-Bench: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning and Visual Dynamics of Multimodal LLMscited by 1
  12. 2026A Physics-Grounded Benchmark for Multi-Agent Dynamics in World Modelscited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026Apple-π: Benchmarking Thinking with Video Towards Law-Grounded Physical Intelligencecited by 1
  2. 2026Physics-Aware Video Generation via Agentic Planning and Graph-Guided Optimizationcited by 1
  3. 2026NICE FACT: Diagnosing and Calibrating VLMs in Quantitative Reasoning for Kinematic Physicscited by 0
  4. 2026UltraVR: A Diagnostic Ultra-Resolution Image-VQA Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Reasoningcited by 0
  5. 2026ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?cited by 0
  6. 2026One Perturbation Is Not Enough: Identifiability and Blind Baselines for Behavioral AI Evaluationcited by 0
  7. 2026OmniFysics-Nano-V2 Technical Report: Understanding the Physical World Across Modalitiescited by 0
  8. 2026Asking the World: Generalist Physical Reasoning through Agentic World Modeling and Probingcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loop
  2. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding
  3. 2026PhysicsMind: Sim and Real Mechanics Benchmarking for Physical Reasoning and Prediction in Foundational VLMs and World Models
  4. 2026Answer-Level Trust Selection for Physical Vision-Language Reasoning
  5. 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibility
  7. 2025Physics Knowledge in Frontier Models: A Diagnostic Study of Failure Modes
  8. 2026PhysQuantAgent: An Inference Pipeline of Mass Estimation for Vision-Language Models