mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoning

arXiv 2508.05405 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2025cs.AIcited by 14

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Although Vision Language Models (VLMs) exhibit strong perceptual abilities and impressive visual reasoning, they struggle with attention to detail and precise action planning in complex, dynamic environments, leading to subpar performance. Real-world tasks typically require complex interactions, advanced spatial reasoning, long-term planning, and continuous strategy refinement, usually necessitating understanding the physics rules of the target scenario. However, evaluating these capabilities in real-world scenarios is often prohibitively expensive. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepPHY, a novel benchmark framework designed to systematically evaluate VLMs' understanding and reasoning about fundamental physical principles through a series of challenging simulated environments. DeepPHY integrates multiple physical reasoning environments of varying difficulty levels and incorporates fine-grained evaluation metrics. Our evaluation finds that even state-of-the-art VLMs struggle to translate descriptive physical knowledge into precise, predictive control.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.

Builds on

11 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? -- Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoning25 May
  2. 2025PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning?21 May
  3. 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models1 Feb

Other references · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,079
  3. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
  4. 2025Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AIcited by 864
  5. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 610
  6. 2024A Survey on Game Playing Agents and Large Models: Methods, Applications, and Challengescited by 22
  7. 2025Mobile-R1: Towards Interactive Capability for VLM-Based Mobile Agent via Systematic Trainingcited by 17
  8. 2025StarDojo: Benchmarking Open-Ended Behaviors of Agentic Multimodal LLMs in Production-Living Simulations with Stardew Valleycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 11.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loop
  2. 2026Plan-Bench: Can Existing VLMs Go Well Beyond Perception to Reason and Plan in Embodied Worlds?
  3. 2025Interpretable Physics Reasoning and Performance Taxonomy in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding
  5. 2025VS-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Strategic Abilities in Multi-Agent Environments
  6. 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025SIMPACT: Simulation-Enabled Action Planning using Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstruction