mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translation

arXiv 2511.21517 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unlike text, speech conveys information about the speaker, such as gender, through acoustic cues like pitch. This gives rise to modality-specific bias concerns. For example, in speech translation (ST), when translating from languages with notional gender, such as English, into languages where gender-ambiguous terms referring to the speaker are assigned grammatical gender, the speaker's vocal characteristics may play a role in gender assignment. This risks misgendering speakers, whether through masculine defaults or vocal-based assumptions. Yet, how ST models make these decisions remains poorly understood. We investigate the mechanisms ST models use to assign gender to speaker-referring terms across three language pairs (en-es/fr/it). To do so, we examine how training data patterns, internal language model (ILM) biases, and acoustic information interact. We find that models do not simply replicate term-specific gender associations from training data, but learn broader patterns of masculine prevalence. While the ILM exhibits strong masculine bias, models can override these preferences based on acoustic input. Using contrastive feature attribution on spectrograms, we reveal that the model with higher gender accuracy relies on a previously unknown mechanism: using first-person pronouns to link gendered terms back to the speaker, accessing gender information distributed across the frequency spectrum rather than concentrated in pitch.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.

Builds on

54 of 90 references.

References · 54

  1. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  2. 2023AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listencited by 343
  3. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
  4. 2020fairseq S2T: Fast Speech-to-Text Modeling with fairseqcited by 176
  5. 2023On decoder-only architecture for speech-to-text and large language model integrationcited by 145
  6. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  7. 2020Hybrid Autoregressive Transducer (hat)cited by 108
  8. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  9. 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
  10. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  11. 2020Internal Language Model Estimation for Domain-Adaptive End-to-End Speech Recognitioncited by 80
  12. 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
38 more
  1. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  2. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  3. 2021Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 50
  4. 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
  5. 2025Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 39
  6. 2022Probing phoneme, language and speaker information in unsupervised speech representationscited by 33
  7. 2021First the worst: Finding better gender translations during beam searchcited by 29
  8. 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in Speech Recognition: Casual Conversations Dataset Transcriptionscited by 26
  9. 2021Investigating Methods to Improve Language Model Integration for Attention-based Encoder-Decoder ASR Modelscited by 25
  10. 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gapscited by 25
  11. 2019Gender Representation in French Broadcast Corpora and Its Impact on ASR Performancecited by 23
  12. 2022Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 23
  13. 2019Analysing Neural Language Models: Contextual Decomposition Reveals Default Reasoning in Number and Gender Assignmentcited by 20
  14. 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech modelscited by 20
  15. 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpuscited by 20
  16. 2020Evaluating Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 19
  17. 2023A Tale of Pronouns: Interpretability Informs Gender Bias Mitigation for Fairer Instruction-Tuned Machine Translationcited by 19
  18. 2018Gender Aware Spoken Language Translation Applied to English-Arabiccited by 18
  19. 2020Breeding Gender-aware Direct Speech Translation Systemscited by 16
  20. 2024On the social bias of speech self-supervised modelscited by 16
  21. 2022A Study of Gender Impact in Self-supervised Models for Speech-to-Text Systemscited by 15
  22. 2023Recent Advances in Direct Speech-to-text Translationcited by 15
  23. 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
  24. 2023When Good and Reproducible Results are a Giant with Feet of Clay: The Importance of Software Quality in NLPcited by 14
  25. 2023Homophone Disambiguation Reveals Patterns of Context Mixing in Speech Transformerscited by 13
  26. 2023Can We Trust Explainable AI Methods on ASR? An Evaluation on Phoneme Recognitioncited by 10
  27. 2021What do End-to-End Speech Models Learn about Speaker, Language and Channel Information? A Layer-wise and Neuron-level Analysiscited by 9
  28. 2024Classist Tools: Social Class Correlates with Performance in NLPcited by 9
  29. 2023Exploring the Impact of Training Data Distribution and Subword Tokenization on Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 7
  30. 2024Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Modelscited by 7
  31. 2025Are We Paying Attention to Her? Investigating Gender Disambiguation and Attention in Machine Translationcited by 7
  32. 2022Visualizing Automatic Speech Recognition -- Means for a Better Understanding?cited by 6
  33. 2024SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generationcited by 6
  34. 2025VoiceBBQ: Investigating Effect of Content and Acoustics in Social Bias of Spoken Language Modelcited by 6
  35. 2025Assumed Identities: Quantifying Gender Bias in Machine Translation of Gender-Ambiguous Occupational Termscited by 5
  36. 2023No Pitch Left Behind: Addressing Gender Unbalance in Automatic Speech Recognition through Pitch Manipulationcited by 4
  37. 2024On the Encoding of Gender in Transformer-based ASR Representationscited by 4
  38. 2025Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differentlycited by 3

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.