Exploring the Impact of Training Data Distribution and Subword Tokenization on Gender Bias in Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the effect of tokenization on gender bias in machine translation, an aspect that has been largely overlooked in previous works. Specifically, we focus on the interactions between the frequency of gendered profession names in training data, their representation in the subword tokenizer's vocabulary, and gender bias. We observe that female and non-stereotypical gender inflections of profession names (e.g., Spanish "doctora" for "female doctor") tend to be split into multiple subword tokens. Our results indicate that the imbalance of gender forms in the model's training corpus is a major factor contributing to gender bias and has a greater impact than subword splitting. We show that analyzing subword splits provides good estimates of gender-form imbalance in the training data and can be used even when the corpus is not publicly available. We also demonstrate that fine-tuning just the token embedding layer can decrease the gap in gender prediction accuracy between female and male forms without impairing the translation quality.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
- 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
- 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
- 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 203
- 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
- 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 192
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 132
6 more
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
- 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
- 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
- 2021Why don't people use character-level machine translation?cited by 27
- 2018How Much Does Tokenization Affect Neural Machine Translation?cited by 26
- 2021How to Split: the Effect of Word Segmentation on Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2025Planted in Pretraining, Swayed by Finetuning: A Case Study on the Origins of Cognitive Biases in LLMscited by 5
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translationcited by 5
- 2026How Does "English (US)" Become the Default? Triangulating Structural Bias Towards American English Across the LLM Pipelinecited by 3
- 2024Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translationcited by 2
- 2025Dual Debiasing: Remove Stereotypes and Keep Factual Gender for Fair Language Modeling and Translationcited by 2
- 2024Current State-of-the-Art of Bias Detection and Mitigation in Machine Translation for African and European Languages: a Reviewcited by 1
- 2026How Does "English (US)" Become the Default? Triangulating Structural Bias Towards American English Across the LLM Pipeline5 Apr 2026
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translation26 Nov 2025
- 2025Planted in Pretraining, Swayed by Finetuning: A Case Study on the Origins of Cognitive Biases in LLMs9 Jul 2025
- 2025Dual Debiasing: Remove Stereotypes and Keep Factual Gender for Fair Language Modeling and Translation17 Jan 2025
- 2024Current State-of-the-Art of Bias Detection and Mitigation in Machine Translation for African and European Languages: a Review28 Oct 2024
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translation2 Jun 2024