Breeding Gender-aware Direct Speech Translation Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In automatic speech translation (ST), traditional cascade approaches involving separate transcription and translation steps are giving ground to increasingly competitive and more robust direct solutions. In particular, by translating speech audio data without intermediate transcription, direct ST models are able to leverage and preserve essential information present in the input (e.g. speaker's vocal characteristics) that is otherwise lost in the cascade framework. Although such ability proved to be useful for gender translation, direct ST is nonetheless affected by gender bias just like its cascade counterpart, as well as machine translation and numerous other natural language processing applications. Moreover, direct ST systems that exclusively rely on vocal biometric features as a gender cue can be unsuitable and potentially harmful for certain users. Going beyond speech signals, in this paper we compare different approaches to inform direct ST models about the speaker's gender and test their ability to handle gender translation from English into Italian and French. To this aim, we manually annotated large datasets with speakers' gender information and used them for experiments reflecting different possible real-world scenarios. Our results show that gender-aware direct ST solutions can significantly outperform strong - but gender-unaware - direct ST models. In particular, the translation of gender-marked words can increase up to 30 points in accuracy while preserving overall translation quality.
Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
16 papers.
Sort:
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gapscited by 24
- 2022Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 23
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech modelscited by 20
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2021How to Split: the Effect of Word Segmentation on Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 11
- 2024Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023Test Suites Task: Evaluation of Gender Fairness in MT with MuST-SHE and INEScited by 6
- 2024Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentationcited by 5
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translationcited by 5
- 2024MELD-ST: An Emotion-aware Speech Translation Datasetcited by 4
- 2025Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differentlycited by 3
4 more
- 2023Good, but not always Fair: An Evaluation of Gender Bias for three commercial Machine Translation Systemscited by 2
- 2023How To Build Competitive Multi-gender Speech Translation Models For Controlling Speaker Gender Translationcited by 2
- 2024Plug, Play, and Fuse: Zero-Shot Joint Decoding via Word-Level Re-ranking Across Diverse Vocabulariescited by 0
- 2026Ouvia: A User-centered Framework for Measuring Usability of Speech Translation in Real-World Communication Scenarioscited by 0
- 2026Ouvia: A User-centered Framework for Measuring Usability of Speech Translation in Real-World Communication Scenarios4 Jun 2026
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translation26 Nov 2025
- 2025Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differently2 Jun 2025
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Plug, Play, and Fuse: Zero-Shot Joint Decoding via Word-Level Re-ranking Across Diverse Vocabularies21 Aug 2024
- 2024Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentation6 Jun 2024
- 2024MELD-ST: An Emotion-aware Speech Translation Dataset21 May 2024
- 2024Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Models14 May 2024
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gaps28 Feb 2024
- 2023Test Suites Task: Evaluation of Gender Fairness in MT with MuST-SHE and INES30 Oct 2023
- 2023How To Build Competitive Multi-gender Speech Translation Models For Controlling Speaker Gender Translation23 Oct 2023
- 2023Good, but not always Fair: An Evaluation of Gender Bias for three commercial Machine Translation Systems9 Jun 2023
4 more
- 2022Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translation18 Mar 2022
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech models15 Oct 2021
- 2021How to Split: the Effect of Word Segmentation on Gender Bias in Speech Translation28 May 2021
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translation13 Apr 2021
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gapscited by 24
- 2022Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 23
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech modelscited by 20
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2021How to Split: the Effect of Word Segmentation on Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 11
- 2024Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023Test Suites Task: Evaluation of Gender Fairness in MT with MuST-SHE and INEScited by 6
- 2024Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentationcited by 5
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translationcited by 5
- 2024MELD-ST: An Emotion-aware Speech Translation Datasetcited by 4
- 2025Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differentlycited by 3
12 most cited of 16 All 16 (JSON)
- 2026Ouvia: A User-centered Framework for Measuring Usability of Speech Translation in Real-World Communication Scenarios4 Jun 2026
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translation26 Nov 2025
- 2025Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differently2 Jun 2025
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Plug, Play, and Fuse: Zero-Shot Joint Decoding via Word-Level Re-ranking Across Diverse Vocabularies21 Aug 2024
- 2024Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentation6 Jun 2024
- 2024MELD-ST: An Emotion-aware Speech Translation Dataset21 May 2024
- 2024Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Models14 May 2024
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gaps28 Feb 2024
- 2023Test Suites Task: Evaluation of Gender Fairness in MT with MuST-SHE and INES30 Oct 2023
- 2023How To Build Competitive Multi-gender Speech Translation Models For Controlling Speaker Gender Translation23 Oct 2023
- 2023Good, but not always Fair: An Evaluation of Gender Bias for three commercial Machine Translation Systems9 Jun 2023
12 newest of 16 All 16 (JSON)