mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Neomorphemes and Large Language Models

arXiv 2405.08477 ↗First posted 14 May 2024cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine translation (MT) models are known to suffer from gender bias, especially when translating into languages with extensive gendered morphology. Accordingly, they still fall short in using gender-inclusive language, also representative of non-binary identities. In this paper, we look at gender-inclusive neomorphemes, neologistic elements that avoid binary gender markings as an approach towards fairer MT. In this direction, we explore prompting techniques with large language models (LLMs) to translate from English into Italian using neomorphemes. So far, this area has been under-explored due to its novelty and the lack of publicly available evaluation resources. We fill this gap by releasing Neo-GATE, a resource designed to evaluate gender-inclusive en-it translation with neomorphemes. With Neo-GATE, we assess four LLMs of different families and sizes and different prompt formats, identifying strengths and weaknesses of each on this novel task for MT.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2024.

Builds on

27 of 67 references.

References · 27

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  6. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  8. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  9. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
  10. 2023Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translationcited by 138
  11. 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
  12. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
15 more
  1. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  2. 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56
  3. 2022Welcome to the Modern World of Pronouns: Identity-Inclusive Natural Language Processing beyond Gendercited by 47
  4. 2023MISGENDERED: Limits of Large Language Models in Understanding Pronounscited by 43
  5. 2020Neural Machine Translation Doesn't Translate Gender Coreference Right Unless You Make Itcited by 40
  6. 2022MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translationcited by 38
  7. 2022Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 23
  8. 2023Gender Neutralization for an Inclusive Machine Translation: from Theoretical Foundations to Open Challengescited by 22
  9. 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpuscited by 20
  10. 2023What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronounscited by 19
  11. 2023GATE: A Challenge Set for Gender-Ambiguous Translation Examplescited by 18
  12. 2020Breeding Gender-aware Direct Speech Translation Systemscited by 16
  13. 2022How Conservative are Language Models? Adapting to the Introduction of Gender-Neutral Pronounscited by 16
  14. 2024A Prompt Response to the Demand for Automatic Gender-Neutral Translationcited by 12
  15. 2021How to Split: the Effect of Word Segmentation on Gender Bias in Speech Translationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

7 papers.