SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spurred by the demand for interpretable models, research on eXplainable AI for language technologies has experienced significant growth, with feature attribution methods emerging as a cornerstone of this progress. While prior work in NLP explored such methods for classification tasks and textual applications, explainability intersecting generation and speech is lagging, with existing techniques failing to account for the autoregressive nature of state-of-the-art models and to provide fine-grained, phonetically meaningful explanations. We address this gap by introducing Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-text Generation (SPES), a feature attribution technique applicable to sequence generation tasks with autoregressive models. SPES provides explanations for each predicted token based on both the input spectrogram and the previously generated tokens. Extensive evaluation on speech recognition and translation demonstrates that SPES generates explanations that are faithful and plausible to humans.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.
Builds on
71 of 125 references.
References · 71
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
38 more
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,838
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,358
- 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2021VoxPopuli: A Large-Scale Multilingual Speech Corpus for Representation Learning, Semi-Supervised Learning and Interpretationcited by 455
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
- 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
- 2018TED-LIUM 3: twice as much data and corpus repartition for experiments on speaker adaptationcited by 224
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2020fairseq S2T: Fast Speech-to-Text Modeling with fairseqcited by 174
- 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
- 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
- 2019Europarl-ST: A Multilingual Corpus For Speech Translation Of Parliamentary Debatescited by 114
- 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 98
- 2024Information Flow Routes: Automatically Interpreting Language Models at Scalecited by 92
- 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2018AudioMNIST: Exploring Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Audio Analysis on a Simple Benchmarkcited by 72
- 2020CoVoST: A Diverse Multilingual Speech-To-Text Translation Corpuscited by 57
- 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
- 2019Interpretable and Fine-Grained Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 49
50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6.
6 papers.
- 2025Transformation of audio embeddings into interpretable, concept-based representationscited by 5
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translationcited by 5
- 2025The Unheard Alternative: Contrastive Explanations for Speech-to-Text Modelscited by 3
- 2025Echoes of Phonetics: Unveiling Relevant Acoustic Cues for ASR via Feature Attributioncited by 2
- 2025On the reliability of feature attribution methods for speech classificationcited by 1
- 2025Cross-Attention is Half Explanation in Speech-to-Text Modelscited by 1
- 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translation26 Nov 2025
- 2025The Unheard Alternative: Contrastive Explanations for Speech-to-Text Models30 Sep 2025
- 2025Cross-Attention is Half Explanation in Speech-to-Text Models22 Sep 2025
- 2025Echoes of Phonetics: Unveiling Relevant Acoustic Cues for ASR via Feature Attribution2 Jun 2025
- 2025On the reliability of feature attribution methods for speech classification22 May 2025
- 2025Transformation of audio embeddings into interpretable, concept-based representations18 Apr 2025