mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Tale of Pronouns: Interpretability Informs Gender Bias Mitigation for Fairer Instruction-Tuned Machine Translation

arXiv 2310.12127 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent instruction fine-tuned models can solve multiple NLP tasks when prompted to do so, with machine translation (MT) being a prominent use case. However, current research often focuses on standard performance benchmarks, leaving compelling fairness and ethical considerations behind. In MT, this might lead to misgendered translations, resulting, among other harms, in the perpetuation of stereotypes and prejudices. In this work, we address this gap by investigating whether and to what extent such models exhibit gender bias in machine translation and how we can mitigate it. Concretely, we compute established gender bias metrics on the WinoMT corpus from English to German and Spanish. We discover that IFT models default to male-inflected translations, even disregarding female occupational stereotypes. Next, using interpretability methods, we unveil that models systematically overlook the pronoun indicating the gender of a target occupation in misgendered translations. Finally, based on this finding, we propose an easy-to-implement and effective bias mitigation solution based on few-shot learning that leads to significantly fairer translations.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.

Builds on

43 of 61 references.

References · 43

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  8. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  9. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  10. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  11. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  12. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
31 more
  1. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  2. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  3. 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
  4. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  5. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  6. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
  7. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  8. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  9. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  10. 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
  11. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  12. 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
  13. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  14. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  15. 2021Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine Translationcited by 62
  16. 2019On Measuring Gender Bias in Translation of Gender-neutral Pronounscited by 59
  17. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  18. 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
  19. 2019When and Why is Document-level Context Useful in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 45
  20. 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
  21. 2020Mitigating Gender Bias in Machine Translation with Target Gender Annotationscited by 42
  22. 2020Neural Machine Translation Doesn't Translate Gender Coreference Right Unless You Make Itcited by 40
  23. 2020Automatically Identifying Gender Issues in Machine Translation using Perturbationscited by 28
  24. 2021Do Context-Aware Translation Models Pay the Right Attention?cited by 21
  25. 2021Few-shot Instruction Prompts for Pretrained Language Models to Detect Social Biasescited by 21
  26. 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpuscited by 20
  27. 2021Evaluating Gender Bias in Hindi-English Machine Translationcited by 19
  28. 2023What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronounscited by 19
  29. 2021GENder-IT: An Annotated English-Italian Parallel Challenge Set for Cross-Linguistic Natural Gender Phenomenacited by 16
  30. 2021Examining Covert Gender Bias: A Case Study in Turkish and English Machine Translation Modelscited by 15
  31. 2021Extending Challenge Sets to Uncover Gender Bias in Machine Translation: Impact of Stereotypical Verbs and Adjectivescited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 11; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Gender Bias in Large Language Models across Multiple Languagescited by 35
  2. 2024Culturally Aware and Adapted NLP: A Taxonomy and a Survey of the State of the Artcited by 26
  3. 2024On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMscited by 24
  4. 2024LLMCheckup: Conversational Examination of Large Language Models via Interpretability Tools and Self-Explanationscited by 16
  5. 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
  6. 2024Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explainedcited by 10
  7. 2024Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
  8. 2024The Lou Dataset -- Exploring the Impact of Gender-Fair Language in German Text Classificationcited by 5
  9. 2025Voice, Bias, and Coreference: An Interpretability Study of Gender in Speech Translationcited by 5
  10. 2025Isolating Culture Neurons in Multilingual Large Language Modelscited by 4
  11. 2025Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasetscited by 3
  12. 2025What Triggers my Model? Contrastive Explanations Inform Gender Choices by Translation Modelscited by 2
7 more
  1. 2026Neuron-Level Interventions for Gendered and Gender-Neutral Generation in Language Modelscited by 2
  2. 2024SoK: Towards Security and Safety of Edge AIcited by 1
  3. 2024Current State-of-the-Art of Bias Detection and Mitigation in Machine Translation for African and European Languages: a Reviewcited by 1
  4. 2025Towards Ethical Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models: A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspectivecited by 1
  5. 2024Fine-grained Gender Control in Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  6. 2026Cultural Fidelity in English-to-Hindi Translation: A Preservation-Fluency Frontier for Gender Recoverabilitycited by 0
  7. 2026Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attributioncited by 0