mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Automating Data Access Permissions in AI Agents

arXiv 2511.17959 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.HCcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI agents attempt to autonomously act on users' behalf, they raise transparency and control issues. We argue that permission-based access control is indispensable in providing meaningful control to the users, but conventional permission models are inadequate for the automated agentic execution paradigm. We therefore propose automated permission management for AI agents. Our key idea is to conduct a user study to identify the factors influencing users' permission decisions and to encode these factors into an ML-based permission management assistant capable of predicting users' future decisions. We find that participants' permission decisions are influenced by communication context but importantly individual preferences tend to remain consistent within contexts, and align with those of other participants. Leveraging these insights, we develop a permission prediction model achieving 85.1% accuracy overall and 94.4% for high-confidence predictions. We find that even without using permission history, our model achieves an accuracy of 66.9%, and a slight increase of training samples (i.e., 1-4) can substantially increase the accuracy by 10.8%.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2025.

Builds on

24 of 88 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  4. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,139
  5. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
  6. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
  8. 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 329
  9. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Designcited by 297
  10. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agentscited by 145
  11. 2024IsolateGPT: An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systemscited by 130
  12. 2023We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguitycited by 126
12 more
  1. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agentscited by 94
  2. 2023LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Pluginscited by 51
  3. 2024ALI-Agent: Assessing LLMs' Alignment with Human Values via Agent-based Evaluationcited by 47
  4. 2024Annotation alignment: Comparing LLM and human annotations of conversational safetycited by 23
  5. 2024Confidence in the Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 18
  6. 2024Dissecting Human and LLM Preferencescited by 17
  7. 2015Android Permissions Remystified: A Field Study on Contextual Integritycited by 15
  8. 2024An In-Depth Investigation of Data Collection in LLM App Ecosystemscited by 14
  9. 2024LLM App Store Analysis: A Vision and Roadmapcited by 13
  10. 2022Tracking, Profiling, and Ad Targeting in the Alexa Echo Smart Speaker Ecosystemcited by 7
  11. 2021OVRseen: Auditing Network Traffic and Privacy Policies in Oculus VRcited by 4
  12. 2023Predicting Privacy Preferences for Smart Devices as Normscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 17.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 28
  2. 2025ceLLMate: Sandboxing Browser AI Agentscited by 16
  3. 2026Reframing LLM Agent Security as an Agent-Human Interaction Problemcited by 9
  4. 2026Behavioral Integrity Verification for AI Agent Skillscited by 7
  5. 2025Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?cited by 4
  6. 2025Personalizing Agent Privacy Decisions via Logical Entailmentcited by 4
  7. 2026How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcementcited by 4
  8. 2026Janus: a Playground for User-Involved Agentic Permission Managementcited by 3
  9. 2026AgentFlow: A Flow-Centric Policy Language and Framework for Securing LLM Agent Systemscited by 2
  10. 2025MiniScope: A Least Privilege Framework for Authorizing Tool Calling Agentscited by 1
  11. 2026PrivScope: Task-scoped Disclosure Control for Hybrid Agentic Systemscited by 1
  12. 2026SeClaw: Spec-Driven Security Task Synthesis for Evaluating Autonomous Agentscited by 1
9 more
  1. 2026Agent Data Injection Attacks are Realistic Threats to AI Agentscited by 1
  2. 2026Assistant or Actor? Student Trust, Control, and Delegation Regret When Using a General-Purpose AI Agentcited by 1
  3. 2026PrivacySIM: Evaluating LLM Simulation of User Privacy Behaviorcited by 0
  4. 2026"Allow" to Achieve, Over-Privileged Inadvertently: The Unintended Cost of Task-Completion-Driven Pop-up Decisions in Mobile GUI Agentscited by 0
  5. 2026Do User-Authored Permission Policies Improve Protection Against AI Agent Overreach?cited by 0
  6. 2026Reflections on Trusting Trust, Revisited: Contaminating Self-Modifying AI Coding Agents with Poisoned Benchmarkscited by 0
  7. 2026Ajar: Measuring Open Privilege in Agent Defensescited by 0
  8. 2026When Valid Tool Calls Change Meaning: Formation-Consistent Dispatch for LLM Agentscited by 0
  9. 2026Pincer: Resource Authorization for Agents using a Digital Twincited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Vision for Access Control in LLM-based Agent Systems
  2. 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
  3. 2026A Theory of Least Autonomy in AI
  4. 2026Empirical Evaluation of Task-Based Permission Scoping Architecture for AI Agents
  5. 2026From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management
  6. 2026PrivacyAlign: Contextual Privacy Alignment for LLM Agents
  7. 2025Progent: Securing AI Agents with Privilege Control
  8. 2026Extending the Formalism and Theoretical Foundations of Cryptography to AI