mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An In-Depth Investigation of Data Collection in LLM App Ecosystems

arXiv 2408.13247 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM app (tool) ecosystems are rapidly evolving to support sophisticated use cases that often require extensive user data collection. Given that LLM apps are developed by third parties and anecdotal evidence indicating inconsistent enforcement of policies by LLM platforms, sharing user data with these apps presents significant privacy risks. In this paper, we aim to bring transparency in data practices of LLM app ecosystems. We examine OpenAI's GPT app ecosystem as a case study. We propose an LLM-based framework to analyze the natural language specifications of GPT Actions (custom tools) and assess their data collection practices. Our analysis reveals that Actions collect excessive data across 24 categories and 145 data types, with third-party Actions collecting 6.03% more data on average. We find that several Actions violate OpenAI's policies by collecting sensitive information, such as passwords, which is explicitly prohibited by OpenAI. Lastly, we develop an LLM-based privacy policy analysis framework to automatically check the consistency of data collection by Actions with disclosures in their privacy policies. Our measurements indicate that the disclosures for most of the collected data types are omitted, with only 5.8% of Actions clearly disclosing their data collection practices.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 65 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  6. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  7. 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
  8. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
  9. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 167
  10. 2018Polisis: Automated Analysis and Presentation of Privacy Policies Using Deep Learningcited by 50
  11. 2023LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Pluginscited by 49
  12. 2024A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerabilitycited by 15
5 more
  1. 2019Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice? Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent Frameworkcited by 9
  2. 2018Cookie Synchronization: Everything You Always Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Askcited by 4
  3. 2021OVRseen: Auditing Network Traffic and Privacy Policies in Oculus VRcited by 4
  4. 2022Opted Out, Yet Tracked: Are Regulations Enough to Protect Your Privacy?cited by 4
  5. 2023PURL: Safe and Effective Sanitization of Link Decorationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: