Preference-Conditioned Language-Guided Abstraction
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Language-conditioned policies and VLAs
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning from demonstrations is a common way for users to teach robots, but it is prone to spurious feature correlations. Recent work constructs state abstractions, i.e. visual representations containing task-relevant features, from language as a way to perform more generalizable learning. However, these abstractions also depend on a user's preference for what matters in a task, which may be hard to describe or infeasible to exhaustively specify using language alone. How do we construct abstractions to capture these latent preferences? We observe that how humans behave reveals how they see the world. Our key insight is that changes in human behavior inform us that there are differences in preferences for how humans see the world, i.e. their state abstractions. In this work, we propose using language models (LMs) to query for those preferences directly given knowledge that a change in behavior has occurred. In our framework, we use the LM in two ways: first, given a text description of the task and knowledge of behavioral change between states, we query the LM for possible hidden preferences; second, given the most likely preference, we query the LM to construct the state abstraction. In this framework, the LM is also able to ask the human directly when uncertain about its own estimate. We demonstrate our framework's ability to construct effective preference-conditioned abstractions in simulated experiments, a user study, as well as on a real Spot robot performing mobile manipulation tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Language-conditioned policies and VLAs, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 35 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.
Builds on
35 of 62 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 34
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 613
22 more
- 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
- 2022VIMA: General Robot Manipulation with Multimodal Promptscited by 403
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 378
- 2016A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Modelcited by 221
- 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 155
- 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 119
- 2021Skill Induction and Planning with Latent Languagecited by 99
- 2019Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 95
- 2022Towards Unified Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge-Enhanced Prompt Learningcited by 85
- 2023GenRec: Large Language Model for Generative Recommendationcited by 62
- 2019Exploiting Persona Information for Diverse Generation of Conversational Responsescited by 58
- 2022Inferring Rewards from Language in Contextcited by 50
- 2022Less is More: Learning to Refine Dialogue History for Personalized Dialogue Generationcited by 47
- 2021People construct simplified mental representations to plancited by 45
- 2021One Chatbot Per Person: Creating Personalized Chatbots based on Implicit User Profilescited by 39
- 2017Agent-Agnostic Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2023UniTRec: A Unified Text-to-Text Transformer and Joint Contrastive Learning Framework for Text-based Recommendationcited by 20
- 2023Diagnosis, Feedback, Adaptation: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Test-Time Policy Adaptationcited by 16
- 2023Contrastive Language, Action, and State Pre-training for Robot Learningcited by 15
- 2021Learning Perceptual Concepts by Bootstrapping from Human Queriescited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperationcited by 11
- 2025Aligning LLMs by Predicting Preferences from User Writing Samplescited by 11
- 2024Adaptive Language-Guided Abstraction from Contrastive Explanationscited by 8
- 2024ELEMENTAL: Interactive Learning from Demonstrations and Vision-Language Models for Reward Design in Roboticscited by 8
- 2024Enabling robots to follow abstract instructions and complete complex dynamic taskscited by 1
- 2025Efficiently Generating Expressive Quadruped Behaviors via Language-Guided Preference Learningcited by 1
- 2025Towards Automated Semantic Interpretability in Reinforcement Learning via Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 1
- 2025QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agentscited by 0
- 2026Robots That Know What to Ask: Recovering Misaligned Rewards through Targeted Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Active Learning for Intent Disambiguation in Interactive Robot Planningcited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Active Learning for Intent Disambiguation in Interactive Robot Planning28 Sep 2026
- 2026Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation30 Jun 2026
- 2026Robots That Know What to Ask: Recovering Misaligned Rewards through Targeted Explanations21 May 2026
- 2025QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agents22 Nov 2025
- 2025Aligning LLMs by Predicting Preferences from User Writing Samples27 May 2025
- 2025Towards Automated Semantic Interpretability in Reinforcement Learning via Vision-Language Models20 Mar 2025
- 2025Efficiently Generating Expressive Quadruped Behaviors via Language-Guided Preference Learning6 Feb 2025
- 2024ELEMENTAL: Interactive Learning from Demonstrations and Vision-Language Models for Reward Design in Robotics27 Nov 2024
- 2024Adaptive Language-Guided Abstraction from Contrastive Explanations12 Sep 2024
- 2024Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation14 Aug 2024
- 2024Enabling robots to follow abstract instructions and complete complex dynamic tasks17 Jun 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Learning with Language-Guided State Abstractions
- 2025Inferring the Unspoken: Aligning Embodied Agents with Implicit Preferences
- 2025Masked IRL: LLM-Guided Reward Disambiguation from Demonstrations and Language
- 2026Interpreting Context-Aware Human Preferences for Multi-Objective Robot Navigation ↗
- 2024Video-Language Critic: Transferable Reward Functions for Language-Conditioned Robotics
- 2024SYNAPSE: SYmbolic Neural-Aided Preference Synthesis Engine
- 2026Does Continual Imitation Learning Remain Grounded? A Language-Perturbed Benchmark for Robotic Task Retention
- 2024PREDILECT: Preferences Delineated with Zero-Shot Language-based Reasoning in Reinforcement Learning