Modeling Human Response to Robot Errors for Timely Error Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In human-robot collaboration, robot errors are inevitable -- damaging user trust, willingness to work together, and task performance. Prior work has shown that people naturally respond to robot errors socially and that in social interactions it is possible to use human responses to detect errors. However, there is little exploration in the domain of non-social, physical human-robot collaboration such as assembly and tool retrieval. In this work, we investigate how people's organic, social responses to robot errors may be used to enable timely automatic detection of errors in physical human-robot interactions. We conducted a data collection study to obtain facial responses to train a real-time detection algorithm and a case study to explore the generalizability of our method with different task settings and errors. Our results show that natural social responses are effective signals for timely detection and localization of robot errors even in non-social contexts and that our method is robust across a variety of task contexts, robot errors, and user responses. This work contributes to robust error detection without detailed task specifications.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 5.
7 papers.
- 2022Robot Learning on the Job: Human-in-the-Loop Autonomy and Learning During Deploymentcited by 108
- 2023Predicting Human Perceptions of Robot Performance During Navigation Taskscited by 2
- 2025Why Robots Are Bad at Detecting Their Mistakes: Limitations of Miscommunication Detection in Human-Robot Dialoguecited by 1
- 2025ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Conversationscited by 1
- 2025Adapting Robot's Explanation for Failures Based on Observed Human Behavior in Human-Robot Collaborationcited by 0
- 2025Training Models to Detect Successive Robot Errors from Human Reactionscited by 0
- 2025QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agentscited by 0
- 2025QuickLAP: Quick Language-Action Preference Learning for Semi-Autonomous Agents22 Nov 2025
- 2025Training Models to Detect Successive Robot Errors from Human Reactions10 Oct 2025
- 2025ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Conversations17 Jul 2025
- 2025Why Robots Are Bad at Detecting Their Mistakes: Limitations of Miscommunication Detection in Human-Robot Dialogue25 Jun 2025
- 2025Adapting Robot's Explanation for Failures Based on Observed Human Behavior in Human-Robot Collaboration13 Apr 2025
- 2023Predicting Human Perceptions of Robot Performance During Navigation Tasks17 Oct 2023
- 2022Robot Learning on the Job: Human-in-the-Loop Autonomy and Learning During Deployment15 Nov 2022