Language model developers should report train-test overlap
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models are extensively evaluated, but correctly interpreting evaluation results requires knowledge of train-test overlap which refers to the extent to which the language model is trained on the very data it is being tested on. The public currently lacks adequate information about train-test overlap: most models have no public train-test overlap statistics, and third parties cannot directly measure train-test overlap since they do not have access to the training data. To make this clear, we document the practices of 30 model developers, finding that just 9 developers report train-test overlap: 4 developers release training data under open-source licenses, enabling the community to directly measure train-test overlap, and 5 developers publish their train-test overlap methodology and statistics. By engaging with language model developers, we provide novel information about train-test overlap for three additional developers. Overall, we take the position that language model developers should publish train-test overlap statistics and/or training data whenever they report evaluation results on public test sets. We hope our work increases transparency into train-test overlap to increase the community-wide trust in model evaluations.
Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
21 of 47 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
- 2020Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasetscited by 138
9 more
- 2024Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 122
- 2024Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligencecited by 117
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024Open-LLM-Leaderboard: From Multi-choice to Open-style Questions for LLMs Evaluation, Benchmark, and Arenacited by 76
- 2021Memorization vs. Generalization: Quantifying Data Leakage in NLP Performance Evaluationcited by 70
- 2023The Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 66
- 2023Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Modelscited by 32
- 2023Koala: An Index for Quantifying Overlaps with Pre-training Corporacited by 19
- 2023A benchmark for toxic comment classification on Civil Comments datasetcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 9; 2026: 4.
16 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 60
- 2025Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scalingcited by 46
- 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained Oncited by 21
- 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscapecited by 21
- 2024WorldMedQA-V: a multilingual, multimodal medical examination dataset for multimodal language models evaluationcited by 11
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 11
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creationcited by 9
- 2025How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? A Qualitative Analysis of Success and Failure Scenarios of Various LLMs in Agentic Simulationscited by 7
- 2025Position: Ensuring mutual privacy is necessary for effective external evaluation of proprietary AI systemscited by 4
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluationscited by 3
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releasescited by 3
- 2026Is MT Ready for the Next Crisis or Pandemic?cited by 2
4 more
- 2024SetLexSem Challenge: Using Set Operations to Evaluate the Lexical and Semantic Robustness of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluationscited by 0
- 2026The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallaciescited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Trackscited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Tracks6 Jul 2026
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases27 Feb 2026
- 2026The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallacies26 Jan 2026
- 2026Is MT Ready for the Next Crisis or Pandemic?15 Jan 2026
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Index11 Dec 2025
- 2025How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? A Qualitative Analysis of Success and Failure Scenarios of Various LLMs in Agentic Simulations8 Dec 2025
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations11 Nov 2025
- 2025A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluations23 Jun 2025
- 2025Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scaling8 May 2025
- 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape7 Apr 2025
- 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained On21 Mar 2025
- 2025Position: Ensuring mutual privacy is necessary for effective external evaluation of proprietary AI systems3 Mar 2025
4 more
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation10 Feb 2025
- 2024SetLexSem Challenge: Using Set Operations to Evaluate the Lexical and Semantic Robustness of Language Models11 Nov 2024
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation29 Oct 2024
- 2024WorldMedQA-V: a multilingual, multimodal medical examination dataset for multimodal language models evaluation16 Oct 2024
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creationcited by 9
- 2025How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? A Qualitative Analysis of Success and Failure Scenarios of Various LLMs in Agentic Simulationscited by 7
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluationscited by 3
- 2025How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? A Qualitative Analysis of Success and Failure Scenarios of Various LLMs in Agentic Simulations8 Dec 2025
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations11 Nov 2025
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation29 Oct 2024
- 2025Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scalingcited by 46
- 2025Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scaling8 May 2025
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 60
- 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained Oncited by 21
- 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscapecited by 21
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 11
- 2025Position: Ensuring mutual privacy is necessary for effective external evaluation of proprietary AI systemscited by 4
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releasescited by 3
- 2026Is MT Ready for the Next Crisis or Pandemic?cited by 2
- 2024SetLexSem Challenge: Using Set Operations to Evaluate the Lexical and Semantic Robustness of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluationscited by 0
- 2026The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallaciescited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Trackscited by 0
- 2026An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Tracks6 Jul 2026
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases27 Feb 2026
- 2026The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallacies26 Jan 2026
- 2026Is MT Ready for the Next Crisis or Pandemic?15 Jan 2026
- 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Index11 Dec 2025
- 2025A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluations23 Jun 2025
- 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape7 Apr 2025
- 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained On21 Mar 2025
- 2025Position: Ensuring mutual privacy is necessary for effective external evaluation of proprietary AI systems3 Mar 2025
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation10 Feb 2025
- 2024SetLexSem Challenge: Using Set Operations to Evaluate the Lexical and Semantic Robustness of Language Models11 Nov 2024