AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
While individual components of agentic architectures have been studied in isolation, there remains limited empirical understanding of how different design dimensions interact within complex multi-agent systems. This study aims to address these gaps by providing a comprehensive enterprise-specific benchmark evaluating 18 distinct agentic configurations across state-of-the-art large language models. We examine four critical agentic system dimensions: orchestration strategy, agent prompt implementation (ReAct versus function calling), memory architecture, and thinking tool integration. Our benchmark reveals significant model-specific architectural preferences that challenge the prevalent one-size-fits-all paradigm in agentic AI systems. It also reveals significant weaknesses in overall agentic performance on enterprise tasks with the highest scoring models achieving a maximum of only 35.3% success on the more complex task and 70.8% on the simpler task. We hope these findings inform the design of future agentic systems by enabling more empirically backed decisions regarding architectural components and model selection.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025X-MAS: Towards Building Multi-Agent Systems with Heterogeneous LLMs22 May
- 2025HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems17 May
- 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents3 Mar
- 2024CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments4 Nov
- 2024EvoAgent: Towards Automatic Multi-Agent Generation via Evolutionary Algorithms20 Jun
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
- 2024WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Setting1 May
- 2023LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models5 Oct
Other references · 8
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
- 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 830
- 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 363
- 2024Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmarkcited by 63
- 2024NESTFUL: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Nested Sequences of API Callscited by 48
- 2025CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactionscited by 47
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026PAST-Bench: Benchmarking the Foundations of Recursive Self-Improvement in Personal Agentscited by 9
- 2026An Empirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agentscited by 6
- 2026KAIJU: An Executive Kernel for Intent-Gated Execution of LLM Agentscited by 2
- 2026Profile-Then-Reason: Bounded Semantic Complexity for Tool-Augmented Language Agentscited by 2
- 2026When Cloud Agents Meet Device Agents: Lessons from Hybrid Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
- 2026Benchmarking AI Agents for Hardware Design Automation via MCP Tool Callingcited by 0
- 2026ChurnBench: A Drift-Aware Benchmark Demonstrating That Refresh Scheduling, Not Cache Age, Governs Staleness in Agentic AIcited by 0
- 2026Continuous Process-Level Evaluation for Evolving Enterprise AI Agent Skillscited by 0
- 2026Continuous Process-Level Evaluation for Evolving Enterprise AI Agent Skills1 Oct 2026
- 2026An Empirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents17 Sep 2026
- 2026ChurnBench: A Drift-Aware Benchmark Demonstrating That Refresh Scheduling, Not Cache Age, Governs Staleness in Agentic AI10 Sep 2026
- 2026Benchmarking AI Agents for Hardware Design Automation via MCP Tool Calling25 Aug 2026
- 2026PAST-Bench: Benchmarking the Foundations of Recursive Self-Improvement in Personal Agents4 Aug 2026
- 2026When Cloud Agents Meet Device Agents: Lessons from Hybrid Multi-Agent Systems28 May 2026
- 2026Profile-Then-Reason: Bounded Semantic Complexity for Tool-Augmented Language Agents5 Apr 2026
- 2026KAIJU: An Executive Kernel for Intent-Gated Execution of LLM Agents31 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
- 2025Distinguishing Autonomous AI Agents from Collaborative Agentic Systems: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Modern Intelligent Architectures
- 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
- 2025Beyond Black-Box Benchmarking: Observability, Analytics, and Optimization of Agentic Systems
- 2026AgentFactory: Towards Automated Agentic System Design and Optimization
- 2025Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems
- 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities