mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Systematic Generalization on gSCAN: What is Nearly Solved and What is Next?

arXiv 2109.12243 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze the grounded SCAN (gSCAN) benchmark, which was recently proposed to study systematic generalization for grounded language understanding. First, we study which aspects of the original benchmark can be solved by commonly used methods in multi-modal research. We find that a general-purpose Transformer-based model with cross-modal attention achieves strong performance on a majority of the gSCAN splits, surprisingly outperforming more specialized approaches from prior work. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that many of the remaining errors reveal the same fundamental challenge in systematic generalization of linguistic constructs regardless of visual context. Second, inspired by this finding, we propose challenging new tasks for gSCAN by generating data to incorporate relations between objects in the visual environment. Finally, we find that current models are surprisingly data inefficient given the narrow scope of commands in gSCAN, suggesting another challenge for future work.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2021.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  3. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  4. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  5. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  6. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
  7. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 345
  8. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  9. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  10. 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
  11. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  12. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
9 more
  1. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
  2. 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
  3. 2017Gated-Attention Architectures for Task-Oriented Language Groundingcited by 72
  4. 2019CLOSURE: Assessing Systematic Generalization of CLEVR Modelscited by 63
  5. 2018Interactive Grounded Language Acquisition and Generalization in a 2D Worldcited by 21
  6. 2020Compositional Networks Enable Systematic Generalization for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 18
  7. 2020Systematic Generalization on gSCAN with Language Conditioned Embeddingcited by 15
  8. 2020Think before you act: A simple baseline for compositional generalizationcited by 11
  9. 2019Is the Red Square Big? MALeViC: Modeling Adjectives Leveraging Visual Contextscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: