Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Earth Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Within the context of representation learning for Earth observation, geographic Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) embed low-dimensional location inputs (longitude, latitude) into high-dimensional embeddings, through models trained on geo-referenced satellite, image or text data. Despite the common aim of geographic INRs to distill Earth's data into compact, learning-friendly representations, we lack an understanding of how much information is contained in these Earth representations, and where that information is concentrated. The intrinsic dimension of a dataset measures the number of degrees of freedom required to capture its local variability, regardless of the ambient high-dimensional space in which it is embedded. This work provides the first study of the intrinsic dimensionality of geographic INRs. Analyzing INRs with ambient dimension between 256 and 512, we find that their intrinsic dimensions fall roughly between 2 and 10 and are sensitive to changing spatial resolution and input modalities during INR pre-training. Furthermore, we show that the intrinsic dimension of a geographic INR correlates with downstream task performance and can capture spatial artifacts, facilitating model evaluation and diagnostics. More broadly, our work offers an architecture-agnostic, label-free metric of information content that can enable unsupervised evaluation, model selection, and pre-training design across INRs.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
47 of 60 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
- 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
- 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
- 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
- 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 302
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
35 more
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
- 2020CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual Informationcited by 233
- 2023GeoCLIP: Clip-Inspired Alignment between Locations and Images for Effective Worldwide Geo-localizationcited by 185
- 2023CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoderscited by 167
- 2023SatCLIP: Global, General-Purpose Location Embeddings with Satellite Imagerycited by 148
- 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 122
- 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
- 2019Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 109
- 2020Multi-Scale Representation Learning for Spatial Feature Distributions using Grid Cellscited by 88
- 2020A Generalizable and Accessible Approach to Machine Learning with Global Satellite Imagerycited by 87
- 2024MMEarth: Exploring Multi-Modal Pretext Tasks For Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 76
- 2021TorchGeo: Deep Learning With Geospatial Datacited by 73
- 2023CSP: Self-Supervised Contrastive Spatial Pre-Training for Geospatial-Visual Representationscited by 67
- 2023Geographic Location Encoding with Spherical Harmonics and Sinusoidal Representation Networkscited by 61
- 2018On the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Image Representationscited by 57
- 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 57
- 2021A Review of Location Encoding for GeoAI: Methods and Applicationscited by 53
- 2021SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learningcited by 53
- 2023Detecting Images Generated by Deep Diffusion Models using their Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 44
- 2023Sphere2Vec: A General-Purpose Location Representation Learning over a Spherical Surface for Large-Scale Geospatial Predictionscited by 38
- 2024TaxaBind: A Unified Embedding Space for Ecological Applicationscited by 33
- 2024GeoSynth: Contextually-Aware High-Resolution Satellite Image Synthesiscited by 32
- 2024TorchSpatial: A Location Encoding Framework and Benchmark for Spatial Representation Learningcited by 29
- 2022Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimation within Tight Localities: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysiscited by 22
- 2017LDMNet: Low Dimensional Manifold Regularized Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2019Estimating the effective dimension of large biological datasets using Fisher separability analysiscited by 19
- 2025RANGE: Retrieval Augmented Neural Fields for Multi-Resolution Geo-Embeddingscited by 18
- 2024LDReg: Local Dimensionality Regularized Self-Supervised Learningcited by 11
- 2025GAIR: Location-Aware Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training with Geo-Aligned Implicit Representationscited by 9
- 2024Contrasting local and global modeling with machine learning and satellite data: A case study estimating tree canopy height in African savannascited by 6
- 2024Deep Random Features for Scalable Interpolation of Spatiotemporal Datacited by 6
- 2024Revisiting Self-supervised Learning of Speech Representation from a Mutual Information Perspectivecited by 5
- 2025GPS as a Control Signal for Image Generationcited by 5
- 2025Can Location Embeddings Enhance Super-Resolution of Satellite Imagery?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.
10 papers.
- 2026Earth Embeddings as Products: Taxonomy, Ecosystem, and Standardized Accesscited by 4
- 2026Localized, High-resolution Geographic Representations with Slepian Functionscited by 3
- 2026Characterizing AlphaEarth Embedding Geometry for Agentic Environmental Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Automatic Layer Selection for Hallucination Detectioncited by 3
- 2026What's in an Earth Embedding? An Explainability Analysis of Location Encoderscited by 1
- 2026Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning for Implicit Earth Embeddings via Location Tyingcited by 0
- 2026Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scalescited by 0
- 2026Curated retrieval versus open web search in public AI information services: a coverage-trust trade-offcited by 0
- 2026TerraNova: A Foundation Model for the Anthropocenecited by 0
- 2026Earth Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026Earth Embeddings4 Aug 2026
- 2026TerraNova: A Foundation Model for the Anthropocene31 Jul 2026
- 2026Curated retrieval versus open web search in public AI information services: a coverage-trust trade-off6 Jul 2026
- 2026What's in an Earth Embedding? An Explainability Analysis of Location Encoders23 Jun 2026
- 2026Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scales22 Jun 2026
- 2026Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning for Implicit Earth Embeddings via Location Tying18 Jun 2026
- 2026Automatic Layer Selection for Hallucination Detection25 May 2026
- 2026Characterizing AlphaEarth Embedding Geometry for Agentic Environmental Reasoning20 Apr 2026
- 2026Localized, High-resolution Geographic Representations with Slepian Functions30 Jan 2026
- 2026Earth Embeddings as Products: Taxonomy, Ecosystem, and Standardized Access19 Jan 2026