Automatic Layer Selection for Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies on hallucination detection have shown that hallucination-related signals are more strongly encoded in intermediate layers than in the final layer of large language models (LLMs). Although a growing body of work has sought to exploit this property for hallucination detection, how to automate the selection of high-performing layers remains underexplored, and principled methods for this purpose are still lacking. To address this gap, we first propose several hypotheses for why such signals emerge in intermediate layers and evaluate corresponding criteria for automatic layer selection across diverse LLM architectures, scales, and tasks, covering both question answering and summarization hallucination detection benchmarks. However, we find that none of these criteria consistently delivers satisfactory performance. We therefore propose a new selection criterion, First Effective Peak of Intrinsic Dimension (FEPoID), which consistently identify optimal or near-optimal layers and outperforms both the aforementioned criteria and existing hallucination detection baselines. FEPoID is training-free and incurs negligible computational overhead. In addition, we study the generation behaviors of LLMs and introduce a simple yet effective truncation strategy, which further amplifies hallucination-related signals and substantially improves overall detection performance. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/DesoloYw/Automatic-Layer-Selection-for-Hallucination-Detection.git
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
36 of 54 references.
References · 36
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 674
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 466
24 more
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 286
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 230
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2023Navigating the Grey Area: How Expressions of Uncertainty and Overconfidence Affect Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 87
- 2023TrueTeacher: Learning Factual Consistency Evaluation with Large Language Modelscited by 82
- 2024LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Querycited by 80
- 2024Making Text Embedders Few-Shot Learnerscited by 78
- 2024Repetition Improves Language Model Embeddingscited by 70
- 2021Scikit-dimension: a Python package for intrinsic dimension estimationcited by 68
- 2024Emergence of a High-Dimensional Abstraction Phase in Language Transformerscited by 56
- 2023The Curious Case of Hallucinatory (Un)answerability: Finding Truths in the Hidden States of Over-Confident Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2024Distinguishing the Knowable from the Unknowable with Language Modelscited by 45
- 2024Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 45
- 2023Large language models implicitly learn to straighten neural sentence trajectories to construct a predictive representation of natural languagecited by 32
- 2025The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 22
- 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
- 2025When Models Lie, We Learn: Multilingual Span-Level Hallucination Detection with PsiloQAcited by 13
- 2023Language Models are Universal Embedderscited by 11
- 2025Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Earth Representationscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Your Agentic LLMs Secretly Encode Indirect Prompt-Injection Exposure in Hidden Statescited by 3
- 2026Temporal Multi-Signal Fusion for Token-Level Hallucination Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Prediction of Prediction (PoP): Inter-Layer Activation Fusion for Single-Pass Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Prediction of Prediction (PoP): Inter-Layer Activation Fusion for Single-Pass Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models27 Aug 2026
- 2026Your Agentic LLMs Secretly Encode Indirect Prompt-Injection Exposure in Hidden States1 Aug 2026
- 2026Temporal Multi-Signal Fusion for Token-Level Hallucination Detection30 Jun 2026