mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GRAID: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning of VLMs Through High-Fidelity Data Generation

arXiv 2510.22118 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on many vision-language tasks but often struggle with spatial reasoningunicodex2014a prerequisite for many applications. Empirically, we find that a dataset produced by a current training data generation pipeline has a 57.6% human validation rate. These rates stem from current limitations: single-image 3D reconstruction introduces cascading modeling errors and requires wide answer tolerances, while caption-based methods require hyper-detailed annotations and suffer from generative hallucinations. We present GRAID, built on the key insight that qualitative spatial relationships can be reliably determined from 2D geometric primitives alone. By operating exclusively on 2D bounding boxes from standard object detectors, GRAID avoids both 3D reconstruction errors and generative hallucinations, resulting in datasets that are of higher quality than existing tools that produce similar datasets as validated by human evaluations. We apply our framework to the BDD100k, NuImages, and Waymo datasets, generating over 8.5 million high-quality VQA pairs creating questions spanning spatial relations, counting, ranking, and size comparisons. We evaluate one of the datasets and find it achieves 91.16% human-validated accuracyunicodex2014compared to 57.6% on a dataset generated by recent work. Critically, we demonstrate that when trained on GRAID data, models learn spatial reasoning concepts that generalize: models fine-tuned on 6 question types improve on over 10 held-out types, with accuracy gains of 47.5% on BDD and 37.9% on NuImages for Llama 3.2B 11B, and when trained on all questions types, achieve improvements on several existing benchmarks such as BLINK. The GRAID framework, datasets, and additional information can be found hrefthis https URLhere.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 45 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2025.

Builds on

45 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025From Diagnosis to Improvement: Probing Spatio-Physical Reasoning in Vision Language Models14 Aug
  2. 2025Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models27 May
  3. 2025SpatialLLM: A Compound 3D-Informed Design towards Spatially-Intelligent Large Multimodal Models1 May
  4. 2025SpaRE: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Synthetic Data29 Apr
  5. 2025CAPTURe: Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Occluded Object Counting21 Apr
  6. 2025LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?25 Mar
  7. 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas3 Mar
  8. 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models11 Dec
  9. 2024Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning21 Oct
  10. 2024Probing Mechanical Reasoning in Large Vision Language Models1 Oct
  11. 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models3 Jun
  12. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan

Other references · 33

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  8. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  9. 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,109
  10. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  11. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  12. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 710
21 more
  1. 2023Nerfstudio: A Modular Framework for Neural Radiance Field Developmentcited by 600
  2. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  3. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
  4. 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 517
  5. 2023Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularitycited by 509
  6. 2023VisionLLM: Large Language Model is also an Open-Ended Decoder for Vision-Centric Taskscited by 501
  7. 2023GLaMM: Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Modelcited by 455
  8. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  9. 2023GPT4RoI: Instruction Tuning Large Language Model on Region-of-Interestcited by 302
  10. 2024NaturalBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Natural Adversarial Samplescited by 97
  11. 2025Zebra-CoT: A Dataset for Interleaved Vision Language Reasoningcited by 84
  12. 2023From Concept to Manufacturing: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Engineering Designcited by 51
  13. 2024Hidden flaws behind expert-level accuracy of multimodal GPT-4 vision in medicinecited by 31
  14. 2024SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluationcited by 31
  15. 2024Agent3D-Zero: An Agent for Zero-shot 3D Understandingcited by 29
  16. 2023Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts?cited by 19
  17. 2023Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspectioncited by 16
  18. 2024VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological Imagescited by 10
  19. 2024LLMI3D: MLLM-based 3D Perception from a Single 2D Imagecited by 7
  20. 2024Do Pre-trained Vision-Language Models Encode Object States?cited by 7
  21. 2025Decoupling the components of geometric understanding in Vision Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3D
  2. 2025G2VLM: Geometry Grounded Vision Language Model with Unified 3D Reconstruction and Spatial Reasoning
  3. 2025InternSpatial: A Comprehensive Dataset for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2024I Know About "Up"! Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Visual Language Models Through 3D Reconstruction
  5. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning
  7. 2026Predicting When to Trust Vision-Language Models for Spatial Reasoning
  8. 2024REVISION: Rendering Tools Enable Spatial Fidelity in Vision-Language Models