mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CoIDO: Efficient Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning via Coupled Importance-Diversity Optimization

arXiv 2510.17847 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 8

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) rely heavily on instruction tuning to align vision and language capabilities, yet the computational cost of training on large-scale datasets remains a major bottleneck. Existing data selection methods aim to mitigate this by selecting important and diverse subsets, but they often suffer from two critical drawbacks: high computational overhead from processing the entire dataset and suboptimal data selection due to separate treatment of importance and diversity. We introduce CoIDO, a novel dual-objective framework that jointly optimizes data importance and diversity to overcome these challenges. Unlike existing approaches that require costly evaluations across the whole dataset, CoIDO employs a lightweight plug-in scorer. This scorer is trained on just a small random sample of data to learn the distribution of the candidate set, drastically reducing computational demands. By leveraging a homoscedastic uncertainty-based formulation, CoIDO effectively balances importance and diversity during training, enabling efficient and scalable data selection. In our experiments, we trained the CoIDO scorer using only 20 percent of randomly sampled data. Once trained, CoIDO was applied to the entire dataset to select a 20 percent subset for instruction tuning. On the widely used LLaVA-1.5-7B model across ten downstream tasks, this selected subset achieved an impressive 98.2 percent of the performance of full-data fine-tuning, on average.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 43 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2025.

Builds on

43 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selection31 Dec
  2. 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Models16 Jun
  3. 2024Finetuned Multimodal Language Models Are High-Quality Image-Text Data Filters5 Mar
  4. 2024Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selection19 Feb
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
  6. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
  7. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models23 Jun

Other references · 36

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  7. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  8. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  9. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  10. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  11. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  12. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
24 more
  1. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  2. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  3. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  5. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  6. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 852
  7. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
  8. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  9. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  10. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  11. 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
  12. 2021TransVG: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Transformerscited by 269
  13. 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
  14. 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
  15. 2022Image-text Retrieval: A Survey on Recent Research and Developmentcited by 55
  16. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  17. 2023One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Modelscited by 43
  18. 2023Sieve: Multimodal Dataset Pruning Using Image Captioning Modelscited by 33
  19. 2023Conformal Nucleus Samplingcited by 32
  20. 2023CiT: Curation in Training for Effective Vision-Language Datacited by 27
  21. 2024FIRST: Teach A Reliable Large Language Model Through Efficient Trustworthy Distillationcited by 11
  22. 2024Beyond Literal Descriptions: Understanding and Locating Open-World Objects Aligned with Human Intentionscited by 8
  23. 2024Self-Bootstrapped Visual-Language Model for Knowledge Selection and Question Answeringcited by 5
  24. 2024Calibration & Reconstruction: Deep Integrated Language for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection
  2. 2026ScalSelect: Scalable Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection for Efficient Visual Instruction Tuning
  3. 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness
  4. 2025MLLM-Selector: Necessity and Diversity-driven High-Value Data Selection for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning
  5. 2024Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning
  6. 2025Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment Trajectories
  7. 2025Visual Compositional Tuning
  8. 2024Curriculum Learning with Quality-Driven Data Selection