Does the Question Really Matter? Training-Free Data Selection for Vision-Language SFT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual instruction tuning is crucial for improving vision-language large models (VLLMs). However, many samples can be solved via linguistic patterns or common-sense shortcuts, without genuine cross-modal reasoning, limiting the effectiveness of multimodal learning. Prior data selection methods often rely on costly proxy model training and focus on difficulty or diversity, failing to capture a sample's true contribution to vision-language joint reasoning. In this paper, we propose CVS, a training-free data selection method based on the insight that, for high-quality multimodal samples, introducing the question should substantially alter the model's assessment of answer validity given an image. CVS leverages a frozen VLLM as an evaluator and measures the discrepancy in answer validity with and without conditioning on the question, enabling the identification of samples that require vision-language joint reasoning while filtering semantic-conflict noise. Experiments on Vision-Flan and The Cauldron show that CVS achieves solid performance across datasets. On Vision-Flan, CVS outperforms full-data training by 3.5% and 4.8% using only 10% and 15% of the data, respectively, and remains robust on the highly heterogeneous Cauldron dataset. Moreover, CVS reduces computational cost by 17.3% and 44.4% compared to COINCIDE and XMAS.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
46 of 58 references.
References · 46
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
34 more
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
- 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 852
- 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
- 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 465
- 2021InfographicVQAcited by 430
- 2024What matters when building vision-language models?cited by 321
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
- 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 233
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 73
- 2023D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity and Difficulty in Data Pruningcited by 68
- 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selectioncited by 57
- 2024Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selectioncited by 48
- 2024VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024Diversity Measurement and Subset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datasetscited by 28
- 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selectioncited by 28
- 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 24
- 2023Vision-Language Instruction Tuning: A Review and Analysiscited by 17
- 2024Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysiscited by 14
- 2025MLLM-Selector: Necessity and Diversity-driven High-Value Data Selection for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 9
- 2025Learning to Instruct for Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 8
- 2025Mitigating Modal Imbalance in Multimodal Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025CoIDO: Efficient Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning via Coupled Importance-Diversity Optimizationcited by 8
- 2025Why Less is More (Sometimes): A Theory of Data Curationcited by 8
- 2025Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment Trajectoriescited by 7
- 2024Extract Free Dense Misalignment from CLIPcited by 5
- 2026ScalSelect: Scalable Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection for Efficient Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 5
- 2023Weakly Supervised Vision-and-Language Pre-training with Relative Representationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.