mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Does the Question Really Matter? Training-Free Data Selection for Vision-Language SFT

arXiv 2603.09715 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual instruction tuning is crucial for improving vision-language large models (VLLMs). However, many samples can be solved via linguistic patterns or common-sense shortcuts, without genuine cross-modal reasoning, limiting the effectiveness of multimodal learning. Prior data selection methods often rely on costly proxy model training and focus on difficulty or diversity, failing to capture a sample's true contribution to vision-language joint reasoning. In this paper, we propose CVS, a training-free data selection method based on the insight that, for high-quality multimodal samples, introducing the question should substantially alter the model's assessment of answer validity given an image. CVS leverages a frozen VLLM as an evaluator and measures the discrepancy in answer validity with and without conditioning on the question, enabling the identification of samples that require vision-language joint reasoning while filtering semantic-conflict noise. Experiments on Vision-Flan and The Cauldron show that CVS achieves solid performance across datasets. On Vision-Flan, CVS outperforms full-data training by 3.5% and 4.8% using only 10% and 15% of the data, respectively, and remains robust on the highly heterogeneous Cauldron dataset. Moreover, CVS reduces computational cost by 17.3% and 44.4% compared to COINCIDE and XMAS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

46 of 58 references.

References · 46

  1. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  5. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  6. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  7. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  8. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  9. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  10. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  11. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  12. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
34 more
  1. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
  2. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 852
  3. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793
  4. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  5. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  6. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  7. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  8. 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
  9. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 465
  10. 2021InfographicVQAcited by 430
  11. 2024What matters when building vision-language models?cited by 321
  12. 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
  13. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  14. 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 233
  15. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
  16. 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 73
  17. 2023D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity and Difficulty in Data Pruningcited by 68
  18. 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selectioncited by 57
  19. 2024Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selectioncited by 48
  20. 2024VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 44
  21. 2024Diversity Measurement and Subset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datasetscited by 28
  22. 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selectioncited by 28
  23. 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 24
  24. 2023Vision-Language Instruction Tuning: A Review and Analysiscited by 17
  25. 2024Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysiscited by 14
  26. 2025MLLM-Selector: Necessity and Diversity-driven High-Value Data Selection for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 9
  27. 2025Learning to Instruct for Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 8
  28. 2025Mitigating Modal Imbalance in Multimodal Reasoningcited by 8
  29. 2025CoIDO: Efficient Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning via Coupled Importance-Diversity Optimizationcited by 8
  30. 2025Why Less is More (Sometimes): A Theory of Data Curationcited by 8
  31. 2025Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment Trajectoriescited by 7
  32. 2024Extract Free Dense Misalignment from CLIPcited by 5
  33. 2026ScalSelect: Scalable Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection for Efficient Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 5
  34. 2023Weakly Supervised Vision-and-Language Pre-training with Relative Representationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.