mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2403.09559 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual instruction tuning is the key to building large vision language models~(LVLMs), which can greatly improve the task generalization and solving capabilities by learning a mixture of instruction data from diverse visual tasks. Previous work mostly collects multiple existing visual instruction datasets via heuristic ways for training (even more than a million instructions), which may introduce data redundancy and enlarge the training cost. To investigate this issue, we conduct a series of empirical studies, which reveal a significant redundancy within the visual instruction datasets, and show that greatly reducing the amount of instructions from several tasks even do not affect the performance. Based on the findings, we propose a high-value data selection approach TIVE, to eliminate redundancy within the visual instruction data and reduce the training cost. In TIVE, we first estimate the instance influence score on its corresponding task, and the task difficulty score, based on the gradient-based influence functions. Then, we leverage the two kinds of scores to determine the task proportion within the selected visual instruction subset, and select high-value instances for each task, respectively. Experiments on various LVLMs show that our approach using only about 15% data can achieve comparable average performance to the full-data fine-tuned model across eight benchmarks, even surpassing it on four of the benchmarks. Our code and data will be publicly released.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selection19 Feb
  2. 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuning18 Feb
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
  4. 2023MM-LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment in Multi-Modal Datasets23 Aug
  5. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension30 Jul
  6. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
  7. 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magic27 Jun
  8. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models23 Jun
  9. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning11 May

Other references · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  6. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  7. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  8. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  9. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  10. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  11. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  12. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025Do we Really Need Visual Instructions? Towards Visual Instruction-Free Fine-tuning for Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Filter Images First, Generate Instructions Later: Pre-Instruction Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning
  4. 2026ScalSelect: Scalable Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection for Efficient Visual Instruction Tuning
  5. 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Models
  6. 2024Rethinking Overlooked Aspects in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Once-For-All: A Train-Once and Select-Anytime Framework for Multimodal Instruction Tuning
  8. 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection