Visual Compositional Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual instruction tuning (VIT) datasets have grown rapidly in scale, yet the informativeness of individual training samples has largely been overlooked. Recent dataset selection methods have shown that a small fraction of such datasets enriched with informative samples can lead to efficient finetuning of Multimodal Large Language Models. In this work, we explore the impact of sample complexity on informative data curation and introduce COMPACT (COMPositional Atomic-to-complex Visual Compositional Tuning), a compositional VIT data recipe that scales training sample complexity by combining multiple atomic visual capabilities in a single training example. Concretely, we synthesize rich and informative text questions for each image, allowing us to significantly reduce the number of training examples required for effective VIT. COMPACT demonstrates superior data efficiency compared to existing data reduction methods. When applied to the LLaVA-665K VIT dataset, COMPACT reduces the data budget by 90% while still achieving 100.2% of the full VIT performance (compared to only 97.5% by the state-of-the-art method) across eight multimodal benchmarks. Furthermore, training on the COMPACT data outperforms training on the full-scale VIT data on particularly complex benchmarks such as MM-Vet (+8.6%) and MMStar (+2.9%). COMPACT offers a scalable and efficient synthetic data generation recipe to improve on vision-language tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.
Builds on
31 of 41 references.
References · 31
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 838
19 more
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 303
- 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
- 2023Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Pretrained Language Models: A Critical Review and Assessmentcited by 230
- 2024SEED-Bench-2-Plus: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models with Text-Rich Visual Comprehensioncited by 146
- 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 141
- 2024Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoderscited by 139
- 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
- 2025Eagle 2: Building Post-Training Data Strategies from Scratch for Frontier Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
- 2023D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity and Difficulty in Data Pruningcited by 69
- 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 52
- 2024Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selectioncited by 48
- 2024Facilitating Multi-turn Function Calling for LLMs via Compositional Instruction Tuningcited by 42
- 2024MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Modelscited by 31
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuning towards General-Purpose Multimodal Model: A Surveycited by 29
- 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selectioncited by 29
- 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024Prompting Large Vision-Language Models for Compositional Reasoningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ScalSelect: Scalable Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection for Efficient Visual Instruction Tuning
- 2025Cream of the Crop: Harvesting Rich, Scalable and Transferable Multi-Modal Data for Instruction Fine-Tuning
- 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Models
- 2023SVIT: Scaling up Visual Instruction Tuning
- 2025Picking the Cream of the Crop: Visual-Centric Data Selection with Collaborative Agents
- 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness
- 2023StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized Image-Dialogue Data
- 2024Adapt-∞: Scalable Continual Multimodal Instruction Tuning via Dynamic Data Selection