mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sample Complexity Bounds for Two Timescale Value-based Reinforcement Learning Algorithms

arXiv 2011.05053 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two timescale stochastic approximation (SA) has been widely used in value-based reinforcement learning algorithms. In the policy evaluation setting, it can model the linear and nonlinear temporal difference learning with gradient correction (TDC) algorithms as linear SA and nonlinear SA, respectively. In the policy optimization setting, two timescale nonlinear SA can also model the greedy gradient-Q (Greedy-GQ) algorithm. In previous studies, the non-asymptotic analysis of linear TDC and Greedy-GQ has been studied in the Markovian setting, with diminishing or accuracy-dependent stepsize. For the nonlinear TDC algorithm, only the asymptotic convergence has been established. In this paper, we study the non-asymptotic convergence rate of two timescale linear and nonlinear TDC and Greedy-GQ under Markovian sampling and with accuracy-independent constant stepsize. For linear TDC, we provide a novel non-asymptotic analysis and show that it attains an ε-accurate solution with the optimal sample complexity of O(ε-1log(1/ε)) under a constant stepsize. For nonlinear TDC and Greedy-GQ, we show that both algorithms attain ε-accurate stationary solution with sample complexity O(ε-2). It is the first non-asymptotic convergence result established for nonlinear TDC under Markovian sampling and our result for Greedy-GQ outperforms the previous result orderwisely by a factor of O(ε-1log(1/ε)).

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Online Robust Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertaintycited by 96
  2. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
  3. 2021Sample and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Actor-Critic Algorithms with Finite-Time Analysiscited by 26
  4. 2023High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 16
  5. 2023A Finite-Sample Analysis of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 15
  6. 2023Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with General Utilitiescited by 15
  7. 2023Tight Finite Time Bounds of Two-Time-Scale Linear Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noisecited by 15
  8. 2021Non-Asymptotic Analysis for Two Time-scale TDC with General Smooth Function Approximationcited by 8
  9. 2024Central Limit Theorem for Two-Timescale Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noise: Theory and Applicationscited by 7
  10. 2021Multi-Agent Off-Policy TD Learning: Finite-Time Analysis with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity and Communication Complexitycited by 5
  11. 2024Stochastic Optimization Algorithms for Instrumental Variable Regression with Streaming Datacited by 4
  12. 2025A Minimal-Assumption Analysis of Q-Learning with Time-Varying Policiescited by 4
7 more
  1. 2022Finite-Time Error Bounds for Greedy-GQcited by 3
  2. 2021PER-ETD: A Polynomially Efficient Emphatic Temporal Difference Learning Methodcited by 2
  3. 2023A new Gradient TD Algorithm with only One Step-size: Convergence Rate Analysis using L-λ Smoothnesscited by 2
  4. 2024Regularized Q-Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 2
  5. 2021A Unified Off-Policy Evaluation Approach for General Value Functioncited by 1
  6. 2022Finite-Time Analysis of Fully Decentralized Single-Timescale Actor-Criticcited by 1
  7. 2023Gauss-Newton Temporal Difference Learning with Nonlinear Function Approximationcited by 0