mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LaSeR: Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding

arXiv 2510.14943 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently emerged as a core paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). To address the lack of verification signals at test time, prior studies incorporate the training of model's self-verification capability into the standard RLVR process, thereby unifying reasoning and verification capabilities within a single LLM. However, previous practice requires the LLM to sequentially generate solutions and self-verifications using two separate prompt templates, which significantly reduces efficiency. In this work, we theoretically reveal that the closed-form solution to the RL objective of self-verification can be reduced to a remarkably simple form: the true reasoning reward of a solution is equal to its last-token self-rewarding score, which is computed as the difference between the policy model's next-token log-probability assigned to any pre-specified token at the solution's last token and a pre-calculated constant, scaled by the KL coefficient. Based on this insight, we propose LaSeR (Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding), an algorithm that simply augments the original RLVR loss with a MSE loss that aligns the last-token self-rewarding scores with verifier-based reasoning rewards, jointly optimizing the reasoning and self-rewarding capabilities of LLMs. The optimized self-rewarding scores can be utilized in both training and testing to enhance model performance. Notably, our algorithm derives these scores from the predicted next-token probability distribution of the last token immediately after generation, incurring only the minimal extra cost of one additional token inference. Experiments show that our method not only improves the model's reasoning performance but also equips it with remarkable self-rewarding capability, thereby boosting its inference-time scaling performance.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 53 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

53 of 65 references.

Closest ancestors · 26

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization26 Jul
  2. 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling25 Jun
  3. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers23 Jun
  4. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs17 Jun
  5. 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers27 May
  6. 2025RL Tango: Reinforcing Generator and Verifier Together for Language Reasoning21 May
  7. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains20 May
  8. 2025Putting the Value Back in RL: Better Test-Time Scaling by Unifying LLM Reasoners With Verifiers7 May
  9. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning22 Apr
  10. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
  11. 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning15 Apr
  12. 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Tasks7 Apr
14 more
  1. 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoning1 Apr
  2. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar
  3. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  5. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  7. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan
  8. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
  9. 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labels2 Dec
  10. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction27 Aug
  11. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  12. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  13. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  14. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 27

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  8. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  9. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  10. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  11. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  12. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
15 more
  1. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  2. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  3. 2025RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 357
  4. 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 101
  5. 2024Tuning Language Models by Proxycited by 88
  6. 2025Don't Overthink it. Preferring Shorter Thinking Chains for Improved LLM Reasoningcited by 82
  7. 2023An Emulator for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models using Small Language Modelscited by 61
  8. 2025MegaScience: Pushing the Frontiers of Post-Training Datasets for Science Reasoningcited by 56
  9. 2025Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Modelscited by 46
  10. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch Bugs in Mathematics: Towards a Better Mathematical Verifier with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 40
  11. 2025Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 38
  12. 2025PAG: Multi-Turn Reinforced LLM Self-Correction with Policy as Generative Verifiercited by 28
  13. 2025STAR-R1: Spatial TrAnsformation Reasoning by Reinforcing Multimodal LLMscited by 21
  14. 2025DeepCritic: Deliberate Critique with Large Language Modelscited by 17
  15. 2025URPO: A Unified Reward & Policy Optimization Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
  2. 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
  3. 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
  4. 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains
  5. 2026From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generation
  6. 2026Knowledge-to-Verification: Exploring RLVR for LLMs in Knowledge-Intensive Domains
  7. 2026To Mix or To Merge: Toward Multi-Domain Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models
  8. 2025VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Following